Answer:
1. A basic finding of labor economics is that workers who have more experience in the labor force are paid more than workers who have less experience (holding constant the amount of formal education). True
2. This might be the case because people with more experience have usually had more on-the-job training. True
3. Some studies have also found that experience at the same job (called job tenure) has an extra positive influence on wages. Job tenure is valuable because people gain <u>job-specific knowledge</u> that is useful to the firm.
Explanation:
A worker with more experience means more on-the-job training, this drastically increases the worker's value of the marginal product of labor.
Answer:
The answer is: A) When the marginal cost of producing an additional unit equals the marginal revenue from that unit.
Explanation:
In economics, we assume that a company´s main goal is to maximize its profit. In order for any company do to this, the marginal cost (MC) of producing an extra unit of production must equal the marginal revenue (MR) obtained by selling that extra unit of production.
Theoretically, in perfect market conditions, MR=MC in the equilibrium point between quantity supplied and quantity demanded. But on real world conditions elasticity of both demand and supply alter the curves.
The price of the bond is $100.
The bond's price is the present value of the face value plus the present value of the interest accrued throughout the bond's term.
The coupon interest rate is 5% of 100, that is $5 per year. The yield to maturity is also 5%. Because the coupon rate is equal to the yield, the bond's present value will only be its face value.
Present value = 5(P/A, 5%, 2) + 100(P/F, 5%, 2)
= 5×1.85941+ 100×0.90703
= 100
Therefore, the price of the bond is $100.
To know more about price of the bond click here:
brainly.com/question/15567868
#SPJ4
Answer:
An art
Explanation:
An art is a blank is a statement used to communicate ones feelings in a nonconfrontational manner.
Answer: Costs of items used up this period but paid for next period
Explanation:
Period Expenses for the period are transactions that should be expensed because they were used in the current period.
Therefore if a period cost is not used in the period, it is not considered a period cost even if the company pays for it in the current period which also means that if a period cost for the period is not paid in the current period but in the next one, it is still a period cost for the current period.
From the above therefore, the period cost is the cost of items used up in this period but paid for in the next one.
The land purchased might look like the obvious choice but it is not because Assets are capitalised and not expensed.