'Which food did dinosaurs compete for?' would be impossible to test through observation. The last option.
<h3>What are observations?</h3>
Observation is a process of obtaining information about phenomena using any of the five senses. In other words, observations are a way of obtaining data for scientific purposes.
Why is the question about dinosaurs' food unanswerable by observations? This is basically because dinosaurs can no longer be observed in this our present world.
Dinosaurs are believed to have gone into extinction about 65 million years ago during the Cretaceous period. Thus, unless one can go back in time, there is no way to answer the question of which foods did dinosaurs compete for through observations.
More on observations can be found here: brainly.com/question/28041973
#SPJ1
Theory relates to a model in science because it presents the possible paradigms and patterns of the said concept and fact. It explains and elaborates the phenomenon of why it happened, how it happened and the factors that are involved in the process. A theory is a possible explanation of certain occurrence.
In addition, any time a scientific theory is challenged, it means it's not a good theory. And this statement is not valid. In theoretical models, they are revisited when there are further studies and discoveries found in a certain area where they can be remodeled and reintegrated instead of disregarding its credibility. Models, theories, and paradigms are not challenged but rather encouraged, they are supported in many studies since these theories and models were created in order for us to understand a certain phenomenon but it would likely help the scientific society to be updated in the new forms or spheres of improvement rather than discouragement. <span> </span>
Food web stability is most dependent on the number of connections among species.