When two parallel lines are intersected by a transversal, the same-side exterior angles are supplementary. That means that their sum is 180.
Using that logic, if the two roads were parallel, then the sum of their same-side exterior angles will add up to 180. Yet their same-side exterior angles add up to 170 (130 + 40 = 170), hence they can't be parallel.
See the drawing attached below.
Using supplmenatry angles (two angles whose sum of measures add up to 180 or a straight line), we can say that:
m<DIE + m<HID = 18
40 + m<HID = 180
m<HID = 140
Similarly:
m<BHC + m<CHI = 180
130 + m<CHI = 180
m<CHI = 50
Using verticle angles therome, (when two lines intersect, the angles opposite to eachother are congruent, or have the same measure), we can say that:
m<DIE = m<GIH = 40
m<GIE = m<HID = 140
m<CHI = m<AHB = 50
m<BHC = m<AHI = 130
1 L, or 1000 mL, of the drink contains 360 mL juice. If there is a total of 1600 mL, we have 360/1600=9/40 (or .225) as the concentration of juice.
2.6 rounds to 3, and 0.33 would round to 0.50. Adding 3 and 0.50 together would equal to 3.50. 59 and 3.50 are no where near to each other which concludes Minh is incorrect.
(Please mark me brainliest)