Answer:
the answer is conference of judges
Answer:
evolutionary is the correct answer.
Explanation:
Answer:
Option A ,
Explanation:
The argument is weak. Arguments are always established with multiple facts, and this facts produces different opinions.
Looking at the two statements, there is only one fact talked about in the statement, which is "Sunrise", and it is said that it rises in Nashville every morning, it is not tied to anything else that would raise another fact, so there is only one fact , which cant establish an argument.
So therefore, the argument,(i.e if there is any), is weak because there is only one specific case established.
Answer:
b. judicial activism, because it was based on a constitutional right to privacy that is not found in the actual words of the Constitution.
Explanation:
Judicial activism is a concept developed in 1947 by an American historian called Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr. it simply talks about a description of a judicial decision made in a law court, in which the judge is more concerned with deciding constitutional issues and invalidating executive or legislative actions.
A clear example of this is the Roe v. Wade case where the supreme court of the United States of America rightly established on January 22, 1973, a woman’s legal right to have an abortion.
Answer:
In a suit against Ethan, Francisco obtains an award of damages. This is c. a payment of money or property as compensation.
Explanation:
At common law, <u>damages</u> are awarded for breach of contract in order to compensate the injured party in the suit. <u>Damages</u> are a remedy in the form of monetary compensation that is paid to the claimant as compensation for loss or injury, that can include damage to property, mental injury or physical injury.
