Answer: I would say that it can be a an example of counterculture since it shows different points of view according to different cultural standards.
Explanation:
Scholars such as Joanne Martin and Caren Siehl, deem counterculture and cultural development as "a balancing act, [that] some core values of a counterculture should present a direct challenge to the core values of a dominant culture". Therefore, a prevalent culture and a counterculture should coexist in an uneasy symbiosis, holding opposite positions on valuable issues that are essentially important to each of them. According to this theory, a counterculture can contribute a plethora of useful functions for the prevalent culture, such as "articulating the foundations between appropriate and inappropriate behavior and providing a safe haven for the development of innovative ideas".
Gu.n control relates to sociology because gu.ns are highly used for crime.
The sociological view of gu.ns focuses on this broader aspect of reality, such as the effectiveness of gu.n law on crime rates, guns as criminology or epidemiological risk factors, or the correlation of gun ownership.
Sociologists can provide valuable insights on the topics like the broader cultural impact of gu.ns, the general use of gu.ns, the role of the state in relation to gun rights, and the impact of gun violence beyond criminal penalties. The social life of guns offers an unprecedented opportunity to rethink the normalization of violence in American society.
Know more about sociology here
brainly.com/question/11098307
#SPJ4
I believe the answer to your question is True sorry if i am wrong.
Destructive criticism is a kind of criticism usually made in order to harm someone. It is used normally as a factor of defamation. It is used to hamper some one' reputation
Explanation:
Criticism is a gate way which provides a reader with clarity of thoughts and sometimes criticism can be too harsh that it would ruin the derogate and destroy the self esteem of a person who faces the criticism. No boy likes to be criticized, this is the fact and hence it depends largely on a person on how to react to a destructive criticism.
Analyse the relevance the criticism and decide how to resolve it when you observe that the criticism is relevant. The critic must not be too harsh while criticizing. He must be professional and turn his criticism in to a complaint which would make both the critic and the criticized to focus on the problem and solve it.