I think that the question is:
Which of the following would serve as support for this assertion? and apart from the first sentence, those are options.
and the answer is: both of the above. One sentence lists the benefits for the team and the other for the company.
Answer:federal trust land - C
constitutional land - D
federal development land - B
federal Native American land - A
Explanation:
Answer:Accepting the pregnancy
Explanation:
Due to the fact that this is a 17 year old, it may be a shock and this young lady may be in denial of it all because they want it all to go away since it may have come unexpectedly. The nurse may just help guid her towards accepting the situation and maybe shedding some light on what she can do moving forward and making references of where she can get even more psychological help and other help that may help her through the journey or in deciding what she will do moving forward.
Answer:
Consequential damage
Explanation:
Consequential damage is the damages that are specific and that damages are not occurred due to an incident but occurred by the consequences of an incident.
For example, a car drive met with an accident when seeing another car accident during passing the second car. so we cannot say that the second car is responsible for the first car accident. It is the indirect result of the first car accident.
We can say that it is a result of indirect consequences.
<u><em>Types of consequential damages are;
</em></u>
New Amsterdam's name was changed to New York, in honor of the Duke of York, who organized the mission. The colony of New Netherland was established by the Dutch West India Company in 1624 and grew to encompass all of present-day New York City and parts of Long Island, Connecticut and New Jersey.
Hope it helps :)
