the answer would be C. <em>Karl Marx. </em>
Answer:
C
Explanation:
We the people elect others we see fit to handle making laws for us
Answer:
c. If an individual implies to another person that he does not suspect the other’s behavior, there is no reason to be hostile toward the other person, whose social life is allowed to proceed in an orderly fashion
Explanation:
First introduced by sociologist Erving Goffman, the concept of civil inattention refers to the interaction between strangers where both of them acknowledge they're aware of the other, and recognize the rights of the other, but at the same time, they act as distant and as indifferent as possible towards each other. Sociologists argue it is an important concept to understand and study because, according to them, <u>if an individual implies to another person that he does not suspect the other’s behavior, there is no reason to be hostile toward the other person, whose social life is allowed to proceed in an orderly fashion</u>. For example, when two strangers are walking in opposite directions, the usual behavior is for one of them or both to make way for the other one to continue on his way uninterrupted and without any fuss. Civil inattention is also important in the study of impression management, as recognizing the other as harmless comes from the other one giving that impression, albeit more often than not unconsciously.
The correct answer is Benefit
Explanation: In this segmentation the magazine works in a way that pleases or determines audience. Always looking for subjects that will benefit groups of consumers who are interested audiences, are reached and can buy your product. So that the magazine can make a profit through the chosen consumers.
In the case of Reisman v. KPMG peat Marwick LLP, the auditors were found guilty of fraud because they were aware of misrepresentations that were relied upon by others.
Plaintiffs contend that KPMG is responsible for producing, providing, issuing, and fraud actively taking part in the issuance of false and misleading financial statements that were provided to the plaintiffs with knowledge of their untruth and with the knowledge that the plaintiffs would depend on them.
Also examined by KPMG were the Marcam-created 1993 quarterly financial statements. None of these quarterly financial statements were ever audited by KPMG, and no audit reports, opinions, or other statements were ever made in connection with them. The Reismans and anyone else at Varnet did not receive copies of Marcam's financial statements from KPMG.
Varnet did not seek any advice from KPMG regarding the subject matter, and KPMG was never contracted to provide any services in connection with the Marcam deal.
To learn more about fraud refer to:
brainly.com/question/14971645
#SPJ4
