Yes. That happened recently after some remarks Clinton made about Catholics
18 percent of people in Switzerland are French.
"I madly made exaggerated corrections with the cycle. We zigged crazily in mid zag, then zagged wildly in mid zig." This passage is an example of using language to convey movement
Option D
<u>Explanation:</u>
When reading the given phrase, it tells that the changes made in cycle in some large represented way. Means, made corrections in the zigzag direction of course and then in the weaken area. So, it clearly shows that the given passage denotes the language used to deliver the about the corrected cycle's motion.
If we look into the other choices, 'exaggeration' denotes magnification, 'satire' means use of humour, and 'irony' indicates 'sharpness'. These terms are not best suited as example to the given passage. Hence, concluded option D as right one.
Answer:
That argument is an example of a falacy masquerading as a valid inference.
Explanation:
Fallacy means error, deception or falsehood. Usually a fallacy is a misconception that is conveyed as true, misleading others. On the other hand, when an argument conveying a true idea is used to derive a false conclusion from false assumptions, the inference is valid.
Based on this, we can conclude that the argument quoted in the above question is a fallacy disguised as valid inference, because the speaker of the argument provides the information as a true statement, but it is wrong to draw conclusions about how Anthony will react after his accident, based on how other people reacted.
