Here are the answers that would best complete the given paragraph above.
The salesperson says, "For the money, you will find no better water reclamation system anywhere!" The customer thinks the salesperson has just told himthat his product is cheaply made and only fairly successful at cleaning the water so it can be reused. Part of the miscommunication was caused by the customer's secretary who came in during the presentation and asked the customer to sign a letter. In terms of the communication process, the salesperson was ENCODING, the customer was DECODING, and the secretary created FEEDBACK.
Answer: $1.43
Explanation:
To solve this, we would use the put call parity. We then calculate the value of the out which will be:
= $7.14 + $15/(1 + 5%) - $20
= $7.14 + $15/(1 + .05) - $20
= $7.14 + $15/(1.05) - $20
= $7.14 + $14.29 - $20
= $1.43
The price of an equivalent put option is $1.43
Answer:
B. Surplus and the price level will fall
Explanation:
If at a particular price level the real domestic output from producers is greater than real domestic output desired by purchasers it means that supply has outstripped demand and price has not changed.
If supply is greater than demand, there would be a surplus and prices would fall.
An increase in supply is shown by a rightward shift of the supply curve.
Answer:
Indifferent selling price =$67 per units
Explanation:
The selling at which Mel rose would be economically be indifferent between accepting and rejecting the special order from Moore is that that equates the relevant cost of making to the revenue from t
Relevant variable cost making
= 22.80 + 18.60 + 14.20 + (75%×12.80) = $65.2
$
Variable cost of special order (= $65.2
× 3,500)= 228,200
Cost of machine <u>6,300</u>
Total relevant cost of special order <u>234,500
</u>
<u>
</u>
The price at which Melrose would be indifferent
= total relevant cost/ number of units
$234,500/3500 units
=$67 per units
For their
past pollution, is what the polluter-pays principle places moral responsibility
on corporations. The polluter needs to pay principle places moral
responsibility on corporation because they need to increase the result of their
past pollution not to be worse. So the answer in this question is for their
past pollution.