1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
pentagon [3]
3 years ago
12

LOOK AT THE PICTURE

Mathematics
1 answer:
mote1985 [20]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

A im pretty sure :)

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in
Suppose a baker claims that his bread height is more than 15 cm, on average. Several of his
yKpoI14uk [10]
  1. Since the p-value is approximately equal to zero (0), we can conclude that there is sufficient evidence that the true mean height for the baker's loaves of bread is greater than (>) 15 cm.
  2. Since 2.37 is greater than (>) 1.645, we reject the null hypothesis (H₀) at 5% level of significance. Therefore, we can conclude that the company’s claims are invalid.

<h3>What is a null hypothesis?</h3>

A null hypothesis (H₀) can be defined the opposite of an alternate hypothesis (H₁) and it asserts that two (2) possibilities are the same.

For the baker's claim, the appropriate null and alternative hypotheses would be given by:

H₀: μ ≤ 15

H₁: μ > 15

Since the standard deviation for the height is given, the population would have a normal distribution, and the population standard deviation is given by:

Population standard deviation = σ/√n

Population standard deviation = 0.5/√10

Population standard deviation = 0.16.

For the p-value, we have:

The p-value is the probability that a sample mean would be the same or greater than (≥) 17 cm. Thus, the p-value is given by:

p-value = P(x > 17) ≈ 0.

Since the p-value is approximately equal to zero (0), we can conclude that there is sufficient evidence that the true mean height for the baker's loaves of bread is greater than (>) 15 cm.

Question 3.

For the oil company's claim, the appropriate null and alternative hypotheses would be given by:

H₀: μ = 0.15

H₁: μ > 0.15

<h3>How to calculate value of the z-score?</h3>

The z-score can be calculated by using this formula:

z=\frac{x\;-\;u}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n} } }

<u>Where:</u>

  • x is the sample mean.
  • u is the mean.
  • is the standard deviation.
  • n is the number of boys.

Substituting the given parameters into the formula, we have;

z=\frac{0.162\;-\;0.15}{\frac{0.04}{\sqrt{40} } }\\\\z=\frac{0.012}{\frac{0.4}{6.3246 } }

z = 0.012/0.0633

z = 0.190.

From the z-table, a z-score of 0.190 is equal to a p-value of 2.37.

For the critical value, we have:

Critical probability (p*) = 1 - α/2

Critical probability (p*) = 1 - 0.1/2

Critical probability (p*) = 0.95.

Hence, the critical value is Zα/2 equal to 1.645.

Since 2.37 is greater than (>) 1.645, we reject the null hypothesis (H₀) at 5% level of significance. Therefore, we can conclude that the company’s claims are invalid.

Read more on null hypothesis here: brainly.com/question/14913351

#SPJ1

4 0
1 year ago
Question 1
salantis [7]

Answer:

$384.00

Step-by-step explanation:

Since $8..0 is 1 hour, just multiply 48 x 8! Hope this helps!

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The map shows the length (in miles) of shoreline along the Gulf of Mexica for each state that borders the body of water. What is
Jet001 [13]

Answer:

TX: 0.23

LA: 0.24

MS: 0.03

AL: 0.03

FL: 0.47

Step-by-step explanation:

In the figure attached, the map is shown.

Total length of the shoreline: 367 + 397 + 44 + 53 + 770 = 1631 miles

probability of the ship landing in Texas: 367/1631 =  0.23

probability of the ship landing in Louisiana: 397/1631 = 0.24

probability of the ship landing in Mississippi: 44/1631 = 0.03

probability of the ship landing in Alabama: 53/1631 = 0.03

probability of the ship landing in Florida: 770/1631 = 0.47

8 0
4 years ago
The Chang family is on their way home from a cross-country road trip. During the trip, the function D (t) = 3260 - 55t can be us
Lilit [14]

Answer:

See below.

Step-by-step explanation:

D(t) = 3260 - 55t

The function that shows their distance from home as a function of time shows that they started 3260 miles from home and are driving at 55 miles per hour.

part a:

D(12) = 3260  55(12)

D(12) = 3260 - 660

D(12) = 2600

Interpretation: After 12 hours of driving home, they are 2600 miles from home.

part b:

D(t) = 2490

3260 - 55t = 2490

-55t = -770

t = 14

Interpretation: When they are 2490 miles from home, they have driven for 14 hours.

5 0
3 years ago
SOMBoDY HELP I pICKED A RANDOM ANSWER aND I DOnT kNoW IF iT IS rIGhT
Bingel [31]

Answer:

Yes.. you are correct!

Step-by-step explanation:

Please give me brainliest.

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Plz help it’s the ANDREA ONe
    15·1 answer
  • Which fraction is closer to 1 than to 0
    9·1 answer
  • Which product is the factored form of the polynomial?
    9·1 answer
  • What time what equals 384
    12·1 answer
  • Which shows how the distributive property can be used to evaluate 7×84/5
    5·1 answer
  • GIVING BRAINLIEST, FIVE STARS, AND THANKS FOR PROPER ANSWER AND CORRECT ANSWER CALLING ALL THE SMARTIES :D
    13·1 answer
  • Please help I would really appreciate it. No fake links please
    7·2 answers
  • Bedford's law states that the probability that a number in a set has a given leading digit d, is P=log(d+1)-log(d), state with p
    15·1 answer
  • 2/
    9·1 answer
  • Solve the following....<br> 4(5-2x)+3=7
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!