How do you write 3,029,251 in word form

Austin goes to a trade show that sells reptiles. There is a $5.00 entrance fee. He visited a booth that sold geckos for $35 each

vivado [14]

The answer is D because 35x3 is 105 + the $5 fee is 110

7 0

3 years ago

A private and a public university are located in the same city. For the private university, 1038 alumni were surveyed and 647 sa

Snezhnost [94]

Answer:

The difference in the sample proportions is not statistically significant at 0.05 significance level.

Step-by-step explanation:

Significance level is missing, it is α=0.05

Let p(public) be the proportion of alumni of the public university who attended at least one class reunion

p(private) be the proportion of alumni of the private university who attended at least one class reunion

Hypotheses are:

$H_{0}$ : p(public) = p(private)

$H_{a}$ : p(public) ≠ p(private)

The formula for the test statistic is given as:

z= $\frac{p1-p2}{\sqrt{{p*(1-p)*(\frac{1}{n1} +\frac{1}{n2}) }}}$ where

p1 is the sample proportion of public university students who attended at least one class reunion ( $\frac{808}{1311}=0.616$ )

p2 is the sample proportion of private university students who attended at least one class reunion ( $\frac{647}{1038}=0.623$ )

p is the pool proportion of p1 and p2 ( $\frac{808+647}{1311+1038}=0.619$ )

n1 is the sample size of the alumni from public university (1311)

n2 is the sample size of the students from private university (1038)

Then z= $\frac{0.616-0.623}{\sqrt{{0.619*0.381*(\frac{1}{1311} +\frac{1}{1038}) }}}$ =-0.207

Since p-value of the test statistic is 0.836>0.05 we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

6 0

3 years ago

Each pail of plaster covers 90 square feet of ceiling. What is the least number of plaster you would need to buy to cover the ce

denpristay [2]

You would need 3 pails of plaster, specifically about 2 pails and a fifth of another but you cant buy a fraction of a pail, so 3 pails are needed.

4 0

3 years ago

Use a proof by contradiction to show that the square root of 3 is national You may use the following fact: For any integer kirke

Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

1. Let us proof that √3 is an irrational number, using <em>reductio ad absurdum</em>. Assume that $\sqrt{3}=\frac{m}{n}$ where $m$ and $n$ are non negative integers, and the fraction $\frac{m}{n}$ is irreducible, i.e., the numbers $m$ and $n$ have no common factors.

Now, squaring the equality at the beginning we get that

$3=\frac{m^2}{n^2}$ (1)

which is equivalent to $3n^2=m^2$ . From this we can deduce that 3 divides the number $m^2$ , and necessarily 3 must divide $m$ . Thus, $m=3p$ , where $p$ is a non negative integer.

Substituting $m=3p$ into (1), we get

$3= \frac{9p^2}{n^2}$

which is equivalent to

$n^2=3p^2$ .

Thus, 3 divides $n^2$ and necessarily 3 must divide $n$ . Hence, $n=3q$ where $q$ is a non negative integer.

Notice that

$\frac{m}{n} = \frac{3p}{3q} = \frac{p}{q}$ .

The above equality means that the fraction $\frac{m}{n}$ is reducible, what contradicts our initial assumption. So, $\sqrt{3}$ is irrational.

2. Let us prove now that the multiplication of an integer and a rational number is a rational number. So, $r\in\mathbb{Q}$ , which is equivalent to say that $r=\frac{m}{n}$ where $m$ and $n$ are non negative integers. Also, assume that $k\in\mathbb{Z}$ . So, we want to prove that $k\cdot r\in\mathbb{Z}$ . Recall that an integer $k$ can be written as

$k=\frac{k}{1}$ .

Then,

$k\cdot r = \frac{k}{1}\frac{m}{n} = \frac{mk}{n}$ .

Notice that the product $mk$ is an integer. Thus, the fraction $\frac{mk}{n}$ is a rational number. Therefore, $k\cdot r\in\mathbb{Q}$ .

3. Let us prove by <em>reductio ad absurdum</em> that the sum of a rational number and an irrational number is an irrational number. So, we have $x$ is irrational and $p\in\mathbb{Q}$ .

Write $q=x+p$ and let us suppose that $q$ is a rational number. So, we get that

$x=q-p$ .

But the subtraction or addition of two rational numbers is rational too. Then, the number $x$ must be rational too, which is a clear contradiction with our hypothesis. Therefore, $x+p$ is irrational.

7 0

3 years ago

I need Help ASAP PLS, WILL FAN AND MEDAL 79 POINTS IF ANSWER

Alenkinab [10]

Okay, i went with a rectangle, if the rectangle base is 12 and the height is 6 then it would be 12*6 + 12*6 + 12*6= 216 now the ratio is easy , 72:72 because that's what makes up the 12*6 and because there is 3 it's 72 two times now for part b 5 x 10 so that is the height and length so now what you want to do is do what you did the second time so it would be 72:50.
Extra tips: To find the volume of any cube you need to know the length, width and height. The formula to find the volume multiplies the length by the width by the height. The good news for a cube is that the measure of each of these dimensions is exactly the same. Therefore, you can multiply the length of any side three times.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers