Ask question

Ask question

All categories

3 years ago

13

Find a negative feedback controller with at least two tunable gains that (1) results in zero steady state error when the input i

s a unit step (1/s). (and show why it works); (2) Gives a settling time of 4 seconds; (3) has 10% overshoot. Use the standard 2nd order approximation. Plot the step response of the system and compare the standard approximation with the plot.

1 answer:

IceJOKER [234]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

Gc(s) = $\frac{0.1s + 0.28727}{s}$

Explanation:

comparing the standard approximation with the plot attached we can tune the PI gains so that the desired response is obtained. this is because the time requirement of the setting is met while the %OS requirement is not achieved instead a 12% OS is seen from the plot.

attached is the detailed solution and the plot in Matlab

You might be interested in

Three tool materials (high-speed steel, cemented carbide, and ceramic) are to be compared for the same turning operation on a ba

Tpy6a [65]

Answer:

Among all three tools, the ceramic tool is taking the least time for the production of a batch, however, machining from the HSS tool is taking the highest time.

Explanation:

The optimum cutting speed for the minimum cost

$V_{opt}= \frac{C}{\left[\left(T_c+\frac{C_e}{C_m}\right)\left(\frac{1}{n}-1\right)\right]^n}\;\cdots(i)$

Where,

C,n = Taylor equation parameters

$T_h$ =Tool changing time in minutes

$C_e$ =Cost per grinding per edge

$C_m$ = Machine and operator cost per minute

On comparing with the Taylor equation $VT^n=C$ ,

Tool life,

$T= \left[ \left(T_t+\frac{C_e}{C_m}\right)\left(\frac{1}{n}-1\right)\right]}\;\cdots(ii)$

Given that,

Cost of operator and machine time $=\$40/hr=\$0.667/min$

Batch setting time = 2 hr

Part handling time: $T_h=2.5$ min

Part diameter: $D=73 mm$ $=73\times 10^{-3} m$

Part length: $l=250 mm=250\times 10^{-3} m$

Feed: $f=0.30 mm/rev= 0.3\times 10^{-3} m/rev$

Depth of cut: $d=3.5 mm$

For the HSS tool:

Tool cost is $20 and it can be ground and reground 15 times and the grinding= $2/grind.

So, $C_e=$ $\$20/15+2=\$3.33/edge$

Tool changing time, $T_t=3$ min.

$C= 80 m/min$

$n=0.130$

(a) From equation (i), cutting speed for the minimum cost:

$V_{opt}= \frac {80}{\left[ \left(3+\frac{3.33}{0.667}\right)\left(\frac{1}{0.13}-1\right)\right]^{0.13}}$

$\Rightarrow 47.7$ m/min

(b) From equation (ii), the tool life,

$T=\left(3+\frac{3.33}{0.667}\right)\left(\frac{1}{0.13}-1\right)\right]}$

$\Rightarrow T=53.4$ min

(c) Cycle time: $T_c=T_h+T_m+\frac{T_t}{n_p}$

where,

$T_m=$ Machining time for one part

$n_p=$ Number of pieces cut in one tool life

$T_m= \frac{l}{fN}$ min, where $N=\frac{V_{opt}}{\pi D}$ is the rpm of the spindle.

$\Rightarrow T_m= \frac{\pi D l}{fV_{opt}}$

$\Rightarrow T_m=\frac{\pi \times 73 \times 250\times 10^{-6}}{0.3\times 10^{-3}\times 47.7}=4.01 min/pc$

So, the number of parts produced in one tool life

$n_p=\frac {T}{T_m}$

$\Rightarrow n_p=\frac {53.4}{4.01}=13.3$

Round it to the lower integer

$\Rightarrow n_p=13$

So, the cycle time

$T_c=2.5+4.01+\frac{3}{13}=6.74$ min/pc

(d) Cost per production unit:

$C_c= C_mT_c+\frac{C_e}{n_p}$

$\Rightarrow C_c=0.667\times6.74+\frac{3.33}{13}=\$4.75/pc$

(e) Total time to complete the batch= Sum of setup time and production time for one batch

$=2\times60+ {50\times 6.74}{50}=457 min=7.62 hr$ .

(f) The proportion of time spent actually cutting metal

$=\frac{50\times4.01}{457}=0.4387=43.87\%$

Now, for the cemented carbide tool:

Cost per edge,

$C_e=$ $\$8/6=\$1.33/edge$

Tool changing time, $T_t=1min$

$C= 650 m/min$

$n=0.30$

(a) Cutting speed for the minimum cost:

$V_{opt}= \frac {650}{\left[ \left(1+\frac{1.33}{0.667}\right)\left(\frac{1}{0.3}-1\right)\right]^{0.3}}=363m/min$ [from(i)]

(b) Tool life,

$T=\left[ \left(1+\frac{1.33}{0.667}\right)\left(\frac{1}{0.3}-1\right)\right]=7min$ [from(ii)]

(c) Cycle time:

$T_c=T_h+T_m+\frac{T_t}{n_p}$

$T_m= \frac{\pi D l}{fV_{opt}}$

$\Rightarrow T_m=\frac{\pi \times 73 \times 250\times 10^{-6}}{0.3\times 10^{-3}\times 363}=0.53min/pc$

$n_p=\frac {7}{0.53}=13.2$

$\Rightarrow n_p=13$ [ nearest lower integer]

So, the cycle time

$T_c=2.5+0.53+\frac{1}{13}=3.11 min/pc$

(d) Cost per production unit:

$C_c= C_mT_c+\frac{C_e}{n_p}$

$\Rightarrow C_c=0.667\times3.11+\frac{1.33}{13}=\$2.18/pc$

(e) Total time to complete the batch $=2\times60+ {50\times 3.11}{50}=275.5 min=4.59 hr$ .

(f) The proportion of time spent actually cutting metal

$=\frac{50\times0.53}{275.5}=0.0962=9.62\%$

Similarly, for the ceramic tool:

$C_e=$ $\$10/6=\$1.67/edge$

$T_t-1min$

$C= 3500 m/min$

$n=0.6$

(a) Cutting speed:

$V_{opt}= \frac {3500}{\left[ \left(1+\frac{1.67}{0.667}\right)\left(\frac{1}{0.6}-1\right)\right]^{0.6}}$

$\Rightarrow V_{opt}=2105 m/min$

(b) Tool life,

$T=\left[ \left(1+\frac{1.67}{0.667}\right)\left(\frac{1}{0.6}-1\right)\right]=2.33 min$

(c) Cycle time:

$T_c=T_h+T_m+\frac{T_t}{n_p}$

$\Rightarrow T_m=\frac{\pi \times 73 \times 250\times 10^{-6}}{0.3\times 10^{-3}\times 2105}=0.091 min/pc$

$n_p=\frac {2.33}{0.091}=25.6$

$\Rightarrow n_p=25 pc/tool\; life$

So,

$T_c=2.5+0.091+\frac{1}{25}=2.63 min/pc$

(d) Cost per production unit:

$C_c= C_mT_c+\frac{C_e}{n_p}$

$\Rightarrow C_c=0.667\times2.63+\frac{1.67}{25}=$1.82/pc$

(e) Total time to complete the batch

$=2\times60+ {50\times 2.63}=251.5 min=4.19 hr$ .

(f) The proportion of time spent actually cutting metal

$=\frac{50\times0.091}{251.5}=0.0181=1.81\%$

3 0

3 years ago

Fully developed conditions are known to exist for water flowing through a 25-mm-diameter tube at 0.01 kg/s and 27 C. What is the

Irina18 [472]

Answer:

0.0406 m/s

Explanation:

Given:

Diameter of the tube, D = 25 mm = 0.025 m

cross-sectional area of the tube = (π/4)D² = (π/4)(0.025)² = 4.9 × 10⁻⁴ m²

Mass flow rate = 0.01 kg/s

Now,

the mass flow rate is given as:

mass flow rate = ρAV

where,

ρ is the density of the water = 1000 kg/m³

A is the area of cross-section of the pipe

V is the average velocity through the pipe

thus,

0.01 = 1000 × 4.9 × 10⁻⁴ × V

or

V = 0.0203 m/s

also,

Reynold's number, Re = $\frac{VD}{\nu}$

where,

ν is the kinematic viscosity of the water = 0.833 × 10⁻⁶ m²/s

thus,

Re = $\frac{0.0203\times0.025}{0.833\times10^{-6}}$

or

Re = 611.39 < 2000

thus,

the flow is laminar

hence,

the maximum velocity = 2 × average velocity = 2 × 0.0203 m/s

or

maximum velocity = 0.0406 m/s

5 0

2 years ago

Thermal energy is...

Yuki888 [10]

B because thermal has to do with temperature and it’s the amount of kinetic and potential energy in and object

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Match the types of AI to the correct automation tasks.

Maru [420]

Answer:

Theory of Mind : A robotic head has a face that recognizes and simulates emotions.

Self aware : A robot tries to protect itself from harm

Purely Reactive : A door automatically opens when a person steps in front of it.

Limited Memory : A personal assistant software tracks a persons travel routes and suggests shorter routes.

Explanation:

Artificial intelligence is simply a technology which enables automation. It enables system perform task without being explicitly controlled. Purely reactive systems do not store Data in memory, it simply observes what going on at the moment which is what it was programmed to do and takes a step. One the machine detects someone approaching up to a certain distance, it opens.

Limited Memory systems store information about the past and this enhances its Decison making, prediction engines, self driving cars use this kind of artificial intelligence.

Theory of Mind : Here, systems are trained to detect, understand and replicate what is understood. Once the robot identifies an emotion, it replicates it.

Self - Aware : An advanced level of AI, where systems will not only be able to replicate what they see, but also make conscious decisions as to which action to take in different circumstances.

5 0

3 years ago

Determine an expression in standard form for the voltage gain VoVs. Hv(jω)=Vo(jω)Vi(jω)=R2R111+jωCR2 Hv(jω)=Vo(jω)Vi(jω)=−R2R111

IceJOKER [234]

Answer:

Applying Kirchhoff's current law at inverting terminal

Explanation:

Detailed explanation is given in the attached document.

5 0

3 years ago