How do i find the factors of 15?

Masja [62]

Answer:

(A) The rate of change in the price of a bushel of corn in the current year is $7.

(B) The price of a bushel of corn in the current year is $2 more than the price of a bushel of corn in the previous year.

Step-by-step explanation:

The graph for the prices of different numbers of bushels of corn at a store in the current year is shown below.

Part A:

The rate of change in the price of a bushel of corn in the current year based upon the number of bushels is known as the slope of the line.

The formula to compute the slope is:

$\text{Slope}=\frac{y_{2}-y_{1}}{x_{2}-x_{1}}$

Consider the ordered pairs: (4, 28) and (10, 70)

Compute the slope of the line as follows:

$\text{Slope}=\frac{y_{2}-y_{1}}{x_{2}-x_{1}}$

$=\frac{70-28}{10-4}\\\\=\frac{42}{6}\\\\=7$

Thus, the rate of change in the price of a bushel of corn in the current year is $7.

Part B:

The data for the price of bushels in the previous year is as follows:

Number of Bushels Price

2 10

4 20

6 30

8 40

Compute the rate of change in the price of a bushel of corn in the previous year based upon the number of bushels as follows:

Consider the ordered pairs: (2, 10) and (6, 30)

$\text{Slope}=\frac{y_{2}-y_{1}}{x_{2}-x_{1}}$

$=\frac{30-10}{6-2}\\\\=\frac{20}{4}\\\\=5$

The rate of change in the price of a bushel of corn in the previous year is $5.

Thus, the price of a bushel of corn in the current year is $2 more than the price of a bushel of corn in the previous year.

5 0

2 years ago

F4f <br> fendimulatto <br> juicyminkz

lapo4ka [179]

Answer:

....................

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0

2 years ago

Of those women who are diagnosed to have early-stage breast cancer, one-third eventually die of the disease. Suppose a screening

Finger [1]

Answer:

A) Alternative hypothesis; Ha: p_o > ⅔

B) Null hypothesis;

H0: p_o = ⅔

C) There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the community screening programme was effective

D) p-value = 0

Its less than the significance value and so we will reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the community screening programme was effective

Step-by-step explanation:

A) We are told that ⅓ of those diagnosed eventually die of the disease. Thus, ⅔ is the fraction that will survive the disease.

Thus, the null hypothesis is;

H0: p_o = ⅔

We are told that a screening programme was started to increase the survival rate. Thus,the alternative hypothesis is;

Ha: p_o > ⅔

B) null hypothesis is;

H0: p_o = ⅔

C) 164 out of the 200 women selected survived the disease.

Thus sample proportion is;

p^ = 164/200

p^ = 0.82

For the z-score value, we will use the formula;

z = (p^ - p_o)/√((p_o(1 - p_o)/n)

Now, p_o = ⅔ = 0.67

Thus;

z = (0.82 - 0.67)/√((0.67(1 - 0.67)/200)

z = 4.51

From online p-value from z-score calculator, we have p-value ≈ 0

This is less than the significant level of 0.05 and therefore we will reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the community screening program was effective.

D) p-value ≈ 0

Reject the null hypothesis

4 0

2 years ago

Help please!!!!!!????!!!!

zavuch27 [327]

Answer:

28 yd²

Step-by-step explanation:

find the two biggest sides

2x4

8 but there are two sides...

8*2= 16

*16*

now side panels

1x4

4 but there are two

4*2= 8

*8*

top and bottom panels

2x1

2 but there are two

2*2= 4

*4*

add them up

16 + 8 + 4= 28

4 0

2 years ago

Point N is on line segment MO. Given MN = x, MO = 3x - 6,

finlep [7]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

N is between points M and O

MN = x

MO = 3x - 6

NO = x + 1

The way it reads MN + NO = MO

x + x + 1 = 3x - 6

2x + 1 = 3x - 6

2x - 2x +1 = 3x -2x - 6

1 = x - 6

1 + 6 = x

x = 7

MO = 3x - 6

MO = 3*7 - 6

MO = 21 - 6

MO = 15

7 0

2 years ago