1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Svetach [21]
3 years ago
11

For 50 points! Can anyone help writing a poem explaining the 3rd amendment

Social Studies
1 answer:
Alchen [17]3 years ago
3 0

These are really bad, but they are something. (the sonnet one is really bad and incomplete)


Haiku:

Without my consent

No soldiers in here

Thanks amendment three


Limerick:

I wont find a solder in my house

Even if he's as quite as a mouse

I will not let him on my tenement

All thanks to the third amendment


Sonnet: (sort of)

James Madison wrote the amendment three.

To quarter soldiers with permission of thee. 

But with my consent I will allow it

The pains of war I can't heal I admit

Thanks to James and the amendment of three

You might be interested in
Factors of production are grouped into four categories, which are _______. ______ is an example of ______.
fenix001 [56]
 Factors of production are grouped into four categories, which are land, labor, capital and e<span>ntrepreneurship. Land are</span><span> natural resources, labor is the work for a paycheck (earns wages), capital denotes physical objects,like  buildings, plants, machinery or non-physical things like human skills,  knowledge and entrepreneurship stands for the ability to organize production, risk taker, ideas... A worker is an example of labor.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Why cant the government just print more money if it needs it??
Rainbow [258]
Because it is against the law and it is just cruel for the government to cheat
5 0
3 years ago
How did the Reformation impact the Scientific Revolution. Give two reasons and explain.
kompoz [17]

Answer:

On 31 October 1517, as legend has it, renegade monk Martin Luther nailed a document to the door of All Saints' Church in Wittenberg, Germany. The Ninety-five Theses marked the beginning of the Reformation, the first major break in the unity of Christianity since 1054. Luther proclaimed a radical new theology: salvation by faith alone, the priesthood of all believers, the ultimate authority not of the Church, but of the Bible. By 1520, he had rejected the authority of the pope. Lutherans and followers of French reformer John Calvin found themselves engaged in bitter wars against Catholicism that lasted for a century and a half.

This age of religious warfare was also the age of the scientific revolution: Nicolaus Copernicus's On the Revolutions of the Celestial Spheres (1543), Tycho Brahe's Introduction to the New Astronomy (1588), Johannes Kepler's New Astronomy (1609), Galileo Galilei's telescopic discoveries (1610), the experiments with air pressure and the vacuum by Blaise Pascal (1648) and Robert Boyle (1660), and Isaac Newton's Principia (1687).

Were the Reformation and this revolution merely coincident, or did the Reformation somehow facilitate or foster the new science, which rejected traditional authorities such as Aristotle and relied on experiments and empirical information? Suppose Martin Luther had never existed; suppose the Reformation had never taken place. Would the history of science have been fundamentally different? Would there have been no scientific revolution? Would we still be living in the world of the horse and cart, the quill pen and the matchlock firearm? Can we imagine a Catholic Newton, or is Newton's Protestantism somehow fundamental to his science?

The key book on this subject was published in 1938 by Robert Merton, the great US sociologist who went on to invent terms that have become part of everyday speech, such as 'role model', 'unanticipated consequence' and 'self-fulfilling prophecy'. Merton's first book, Science, Technology and Society in Seventeenth-Century England, attracted little attention initially. But in the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s, historians of science endlessly and inconclusively debated what they called the Merton thesis: that Puritanism, the religion of the founders of the New England colonies, had fostered scientific enquiry, and that this was precisely why England, where the religion had motivated a civil war, had a central role in the construction of modern science.

Those debates have fallen quiet. But it is still widely argued by historians of science that the Protestant religion and the new science were inextricably intertwined, as Protestantism turned away from the spirituality of Catholicism and fostered a practical engagement with the world, exemplified in the idea that a person's occupation was their vocation. Merton was following in the footsteps of German sociologist Max Weber, who argued that Protestantism had led to capitalism.

I disagree. First, plenty of great sixteenth- and seventeenth-century scientists were Catholics, including Copernicus, Galileo and Pascal. Second, one of the most striking features of the new science was how easily it passed back and forth between Catholics and Protestants. At the height of the religious wars, two Protestant astronomers were appointed one after another as mathematicians to the Catholic Holy Roman Emperor: first Brahe, then Kepler. Louis XIV, who expelled the Protestants from France in 1685, had previously hired Protestants such as Christiaan Huygens for his Academy of Sciences. The experiments of Pascal, a devout Catholic, were quickly copied in England by the devoutly Protestant Boyle. The Catholic Church banned Copernicanism, but was quick to change its mind in the light of Newton's discoveries. And third, if we can point to Protestant communities that seem to have produced more than their share of great scientists, we can also point to Protestant societies where the new science did not flourish until later — Scotland, for example.

Discovery and dissemination

What made the scientific revolution possible were three developments. A new confidence in the possibility of discovery was the first: there was no word for discovery in European languages before exploration uncovered the Americas. The printing press was the second. It brought about an information revolution: instead of commenting on a few canonical texts, intellectuals learnt to navigate whole libraries of information. In the process, they invented the modern idea of the fact — reliable information that could be checked and tested. Finally, there was the new claim by mathematicians to be better at understanding the world than philosophers, a claim that was grounded in their development of the experimental method.

8 0
3 years ago
1.) Why did Washington decide to allow black men to join the Continental Army?
Anon25 [30]

Answer:

because he loved black men

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
What does the handshake between the soldier and civilian in this photograph symbolize?
Iteru [2.4K]
Unification of east and west germany
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Beats Electronics has been able to outperform Audio-Technica, Bose, JBL, Skullcandy, Sennheiser, and Sony in the high-end, premi
    7·1 answer
  • Book is to chapter as organization is to what
    8·2 answers
  • If the terms of a contract are clear and unambiguous, a court may not consider extrinsic evidence (any evidence not contained in
    5·1 answer
  • Although China’s total economic output, measured by Gross Domestic Product (GDP), is third largest in the world, it is considere
    7·1 answer
  • New England's two most profitable industries were
    9·2 answers
  • Specific answer please!!!!
    15·1 answer
  • Which concerns of Thoreau led to his refusal to pay a government tax?
    11·1 answer
  • Can anyone help me please......
    14·1 answer
  • If a person makes a smart investment, such as in a piece of property that goes up in value, the person shouldn't have to pay a t
    6·1 answer
  • Guys hurry anyone know the answer???
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!