Answer:
Option D: Burr's belief that Hamilton had slandered him.
Explanation:
The duel stemmed from a history of animosity between both men over the years. The existing personal animosity and personal bitterness between both individuals came to a head in the run-up to the governorship election in New-York in 1804.
The Albany Registrar published a letter sent from Charles Cooper to senator Philip Schuyler which referenced a statement made by General Hamilton describing Colonel Burr as being a dangerous and despicable human being incapable of running a government.
The ensuing duel was as a result of this defamation.
A
Wiksoxococovivsmwldkckcdoe
Answer: A. Both treasury stock and paid in capital from treasury stock
Explanation:
When using the cost method, the stock is recorded at cost which means that the stock repurchased (Treasury Stock) is recorded at cost of buying it. If it is sold for a higher amount than it was bought for, the amount it was bought for will be credited from the Treasury account.
The remaining amount will be credited to the Additional Paid-In Capital account which is used to record variations between the amount equity was bought for versus the amount it was sold for.
Had the repurchased stock been sold for less, the Additional Paid In Capital Account would have been debited.
Answer:
The correct answer is "Conflict between professionalism and commercialism".
Explanation:
- As a professional service rather than partnership presents a condition that may impede the implementation including its independent review-this statement generates possible interest confliction as the impairment of the conclusion of the investigation contributes to the violation of conduct.
- A professional service produces a condition that may well compromise impartial judgment - The journalistic integrity of an external auditor should not be compromised according to the standard prohibition claim. This can then cause friction.
So that the given statement refers to the above solution.
Answer:
c. It tends to provide outcomes that satisfy all parties.
Explanation:
Base on the scenario been described in the question, distributive bargaining does all of the except that is doest not provide outcomes that satisfy all parties, the type of bargaining that satisfy both parties is integrative bargaining.
Distributive bargaining is an adversarial type of negotiation in which it is believed that if any gain of a competitor is a loss to the other party in the negotiation .
