Answer:
See the argument below
Step-by-step explanation:
I will give the argument in symbolic form, using rules of inference.
First, let's conclude c.
(1)⇒a by simplification of conjunction
a⇒¬(¬a) by double negation
¬(¬a)∧(2)⇒¬(¬c) by Modus tollens
¬(¬c)⇒c by double negation
Now, the premise (5) is equivalent to ¬d∧¬h which is one of De Morgan's laws. From simplification, we conclude ¬h. We also concluded c before, then by adjunction, we conclude c∧¬h.
An alternative approach to De Morgan's law is the following:
By contradiction proof, assume h is true.
h⇒d∨h by addition
(5)∧(d∨h)⇒¬(d∨h)∧(d∨h), a contradiction. Hence we conclude ¬h.
I think the correct answer is D
(-3,-3) is your answer please give brainliest!
Events A and B are dependent (option B).
<h3>What are dependent events?</h3>
Dependent events are events that can occur together. If event A occurs then event B would occur. In a standard deck of cards, cards that are hearts are red in colour. If a heart card is picked, then it would be red in colour.
Independents events are events whose occurrence do not depend on each other. They are random events.
To learn more about independent events, please check: brainly.com/question/13075229
#SPJ1
