Answer:
$21.859
Explanation:
According to the scenario, computation of the given data are as follow:-
Present Value = D0 × (1 + growth rate)^time ÷ (1 + Required Rate of Return)^time period
1st Year PV = $1 × (1 + 0.20)^1 ÷ (1+ 0.12)^1
= 1.20 ÷ 1.12
= 1.071
2nd Year PV = $1 × (1 + 0.20)^2 ÷ (1+ 0.12)^2
= $1 × (1.44) ÷ 1.254
= $1.148
3rd Year PV = $1 × ( 1 + 0.20)^2 × (1 + 0.10) ÷ (1 + 0.12)^3
= $1 × (1.44) × (1.10) ÷ 1.405
= $1.127
4th Year PV = $1 × ( 1 + 0.20)^2 × (1 + 0.10)^2 ÷ ( 1 +0.12)^4
= $1 × (1.44) × (1.21) ÷ 1.574
= $1.107
5th Year PV = $1 × (1 + 0.20)^2 × ( 1 +0.10)^3 ÷ (1 + 0.12)^5
= $1 × (1.44) × (1.331) ÷ 1.762
= $1.088
6th Year PV = $1 × (1 + 0.20)^2 × (1 + .10)^3 × (1.05) ÷ [(0.12 - 0.05) × (1+.12)^5]
= $1 × (1.44) × (1.331) × (1.05) ÷ (0.07) × (1.762)
= $2.012 ÷ 0.1233
= $16.318
Now
Share’s Current Value is
= $1.071 + $1.148 + $1.127 + $1.107 + $1.088 + $16.318
= $21.859
We simply applied the above formula
Answer:
Project Manager
Explanation:
Project Manager may be defined as the professional or the personnel in the field of the project management. The responsibility of the project management is to create plans and strategies and execute them to achieve their goals of completing a project under them. The coordination and interaction with the team members is very crucial in project management.
Answer:
Departmental wage expenses for Dept. Y = 8,750 and Dept. Z = 10,250.
Explanation:
Direct wages of Y and Z sum 2,000 + 3,500 = 5,500. The remaining expenses are the difference between total wage expense and direct wage expenses. That means indirect expenses are 19,000 - 5,500 = 13,500. These has to be allocated half for each department.
- Dept Y expense is 2,000 + 13,500/2 = 2,000 + 6,750 = 8,750
- Dept Z expense is 3,500 + 13,500/2 = 3,500 + 6,750 = 10,250
The best answer to the question is (D) copyright law.
Copyright law is defined as <u>exclusive rights that a creator has for his or her creations, which encompasses literary and artistic works, such as ones mentioned in the question: musical compositions, movies, web content, etc. </u>
The other options are unsuitable since <em>patent protection</em> is for inventions, <em>trademark theory</em> is for companies and their products, while<em> free-market case law </em>does not refer to an actual set of laws.
Answer:
<em>Most definitely, Tony would lose due to the integration clause.</em>
Explanation:
An integration clause <em>requires a short paragraph to be inserted into a written contract to confirm a final deal between two sides.</em>
Since drafting a written contract, it may fail to be fully checked by one of the parties involved to ensure that all provisions are included and that both parties sign the contract, which Tony failed to consider.
If this happens, one party could contend that the other failed to uphold a particular condition or phrase that they consented to verbally.