Answer:
book value at the end of year 3 = $115,200
Explanation:
![\left[\begin{array}{ccccc}$Year&$Beginning&$Dep-Expense&$Acc. \: Dep&$Ending\\0&-&-&-&400,000\\1&400,000&80,000&80,000&320,000\\2&320,000&128,000&208,000&192,000\\3&192,000&76,800&284,800&115,200\\\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccccc%7D%24Year%26%24Beginning%26%24Dep-Expense%26%24Acc.%20%5C%3A%20Dep%26%24Ending%5C%5C0%26-%26-%26-%26400%2C000%5C%5C1%26400%2C000%2680%2C000%2680%2C000%26320%2C000%5C%5C2%26320%2C000%26128%2C000%26208%2C000%26192%2C000%5C%5C3%26192%2C000%2676%2C800%26284%2C800%26115%2C200%5C%5C%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
Year 1 Depreciation expense
400,000 x 20% = 80,000
Year 2 Depreciation expense
400,000 x 32% =128,000
Year 3 Depreciation expense
400,000 x 19.2% = 76,800
Book value = carrying value - depreciation for the year
or
purchase - accumulated depreciation
Answer:
30.000
Explanation:
Income before taxes $300,000
Timing difference between books and Tax (A)
$100,000
Permanent difference cannot be considered for calculation of Differed tax liability or Deferred tax asset $40,000 (B) is zero
Total Timing deference (C=A+B) $100,000
Tax rate enacted for future (D) 30%
<h2>
Differed tax liability (C*D) $30,000
</h2>
<h2>
</h2>
Answer:
C. Create a rotating assignment so each team member shares note taking.
Explanation:
In the case noted in the question above, there is a situation that could be unpleasant if it were decided by some type of bias.
Therefore, the most appropriate alternative for the team to address this situation would be to create a rotating assignment for each team member to share the notes. This way it would not happen that a team member is always chosen to perform a task that causes dissatisfaction in the whole team. Creating a rotating assignment to carry out the task would guarantee the uniformity of the task assignment and avoid possible dissatisfactions, inequalities and interpersonal conflicts that could arise.
In this scenario, Roger's behaviour would best be classified as an elaborator.
While working in a group each individual contributes in their own ways.
Benne and Sheats defined roles in a group and classified them in three categories. These categories are
1. Task roles : relate to actually achieving the task goals.
2. Personal Roles : relate to the interpersonal relationships between team members. A highly qualified team, when all team members with a high ego will not be able to achieve the desired goal within the deadline.
3.Dysfunctional Roles: do not contribute in any way to a group. They are only interested in serving their own interests and more often than not, are responsible for disruptions and discord within the group.
The right combination of various roles in a group goes a long way in achieving a goal.
The Elaborator is a task role. The Elaborator takes up an idea and gives his views on how that idea might turn out if it is implemented in the given suggestion.
