The fundamental attribution error can lead the teacher to conclude that Freire did poorly on the arithmetic test because he felt unmotivated to do well in school.
This bias can be understood as one in which people incorrectly attribute an action of another individual based on their character and personality.
The fundamental attribution error does not encompass environmental and situational factors to explain someone's behavior, but judges their actions as if they came entirely from their personality.
Therefore, this is a bias that can lead to prejudice, rash judgments, communication noise and relationship problems. It should be avoided from a broad view of people and situations.
Learn more here:
brainly.com/question/10218205
The correct answer is Ceteris paribus
Ceteris Paribus, is a concept of the Economy, which translated means, “everything more constant”.
In this way, Ceteris Paribus becomes a very important concept, as some studies that contain a large number of variables can be simplified.
In other words, you keep some variables constant, while you change others to identify their impact on the whole.
Answer:
Option b=> three times the annual cost of a thrifty food budget for an urban family of four.
Explanation:
In the United States of America or any country in the world, there is a need for the government to know the poverty line of citizens in the country so as to know how to prepare or create something to reduce the rate of poverty in the country.
The term "poverty line'' is also referred to as poverty threshold. The poverty line shows the point or level of income that one has to have in order to cater for their need because people that falls below the
poverty line find it difficult to cater for their needs.
"The poverty line is defined as three times the annual cost of a thrifty food budget for an urban family of four.''
Because he felt that there should be power
This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is as follows:
Although the leaders of two enemy nations admit to a buildup of their own military forces, each sees the other country's actions as unreasonable and motivated by evil intentions. This situation best illustrates:
the mere exposure effect.
the just-world phenomenon.
mirror-image perceptions.
deindividuation.
social facilitation.
None of the listed answers are correct
Answer:
This situation best illustrates mirror-image perceptions.
Explanation:
The term mirror-image perception refers to the human tendency of viewing others as the enemy, as evil, especially in a situation of conflict. It is called mirror-image because both people or sides involved in the conflict see themselves as good, and the other as the villain. That is precisely the case described in the passage. Both leaders do not see a problem concerning their own buildup of their military forces - they "know" they are doing it for good reasons. But both of them also think that the other leader doing it is a sign of evil intentions on his part.
