The United States homefront during World War I saw a systematic mobilization of the country's entire population and economy to produce the soldiers, food supplies, ammunitions and money necessary to win the war. Although the United States entered the war in April 1917, there had been very little planning, or even recognition of the problems that Great Britain and the other Allies had to solve on their own home fronts. As a result, the level of confusion was high in the first 12 months. The war came in the midst of the Progressive Era, when efficiency and expertise were highly valued. Therefore, both individual states and the federal government established a multitude of temporary agencies to bring together the expertise necessary to redirect the economy and society into the production of munitions and food needed for the war, as well as the circulation of beliefs and ideals in order to motivate the people.
Okay so I'm not sure exactly if this is talking about primary or secondary sources, but if it is then I'm fairly certain that this would be a secondary source since the student wasn't there to witness it, they're relying on their research to give them information.
Answer:
The attitude of not practicing what you preach as displayed by Pastors
Explanation:
When a pastor mounts a pulpit to preach the need or to pay evil for evil, it creates a cognitive feeling of the essence of doing good. But when the same preacher is seen living contrary to what he preached, for example fighting because of money, it invariably redefine ones notion, attitude, belief and behaviour, most especially after making a resolve not to fight again.
This consistency theory is purportedly postulated by Karman's theory of notion.
