All categories

3 years ago

What is m∠RSU? PLEASE HELP

Mathematics

2 answers:

Tju [1.3M]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

39°

Step-by-step explanation:

This is a 90° angel and we already have 51°s, so we do 90 - 51: 90 - 51 = 39

I hope this helps!

Arada [10]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

∠RSU is equal to 39

Step-by-step explanation:

∠RST = 90.

So, 90 - 51 = 39

So ∠RSU = 39

Hope this helps!!

You might be interested in

Y(x - (9 – 4y)); use x = 4, and y = 2

yanalaym [24]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

Help mee plz... i ' m in trouble ans 2,3&4

motikmotik

Step-by-step explanation:

2) a= -3/8 and b= -5/3

a×b= b×a

-3 × -5 = -5 × -3

8. 3. 3. 8

15 = 15

24. 24

3)a=8/11 and b= -6/11

a×b=b×a

8 × -6 = -6 × 8

11. 11. 11. 11

-48 = -48

121. 121

4) a= -9/15 and b= -7/2

a×b=b×a

-9 × -7 = -7 × -9

15. 2. 2. 15

63 = 63 , let's divide both by 3

30. 30

21 = 21

10. 10

5 0

3 years ago

The inequality x ≥ −10 represents the possible values for x on a number line. Which is NOT a possible value for x? A) −11 B) −10

Serhud [2]

Answer:

A)-11

-11 is less than -10 so it cant be great than -10

3 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

3) Scenario 1 Scenario 2 y = 50x x is time in hours y is distance in miles Compare the scenarios and determine which shows the g

Olegator [25]

Answer:

Option A.

Step-by-step explanation:

Consider the below figure attached with this question.

Scenario 1 represented by the graph.

From the graph it is clear that the line passes through the points (1,60) and (2,120).

Slope of the line is

$y=\dfrac{y_2-y_1}{x_2-x_1}$

$y=\dfrac{120-60}{2-1}=60$

The slope of line is 60. It means the speed is 60 miles per hour.

Scenario 2 defined by the equation,

$y=50x$

If an equation defined as $y=mx+b$ , then m is slope and b is y-intercept.

$m=50$

The slope of line is 50. It means the speed is 50 miles per hour.

The slope of Scenario 1 is greater than slope of Scenario 2. So, the Scenario 1 shows the greater speed.

Hence, the correct option is A.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Eva is 29 years old and has 2 children, ages 3 and 5. She makes $48,500 a year. Eva decides to buy a $400,000 10-year term pol

nirvana33 [79]

I believe it's A. Eva would have been better off selecting the 20-year term policy.
Unde current circumtances, 10-year term policy wouldn't guarantee thesafety of the kids because even after the policy ends, Eva's kids still haven't entered the age where they could find their own income (they would be 12, 13, and 15).
If Eva decided to add another 10 year despite the extra charge, The kids will be covered until they enter the productive age.

8 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers