D- cation, When an atom loses a electron it becomes an ion but the result is called a cation. Then when electrons are gained it’s a anion.
The law of conservation of energy supports climate change research because the energy we use is released into the atmosphere, creating loop of continual absorption and releasing of heat.
<h3>Law of conservation of energy</h3>
The law states that energy can neither be created nor destroyed but can always be converted from one form to another.
In light of this, any energy used by humans or natural processes is not destroyed. Instead, they are converted into another form or released into the atmosphere.
In the atmosphere, absorption and release of heat energy by greenhouse gases and irradiation create a loop. This loop causes a net heating or cooling of the planet, a phenomenon that affects the climate.
More on the law of conservation of energy can be found here: brainly.com/question/20971995
<span>Answer:
Venus is nearer to the Sun, and gets relatively more power from it. Earth is 93 million miles from the Sun, by and large, while Venus is just 67.25 million (by and large) from the Sun. Since the force of the Sun's radiation diminishes with remove from it as 1 over r-squared, Venus gets (93/67.25) squared, or 1.91 times the power for each unit range that Earth gets, all things considered.
Since the emanating temperature of a confined body in space fluctuates as the fourth-foundation of the power occurrence upon it, by the Stefan-Boltzmann law, the transmitting temperature of Venus ought to be the fourth-base of 1.91 = 1.18 times that of the Earth. Moreover, since the environmental weight differs as the temperature, the temperature at any given weight level in the Venusian air ought to be 1.18 times the temperature at that same weight level in the Earth climate, INDEPENDENT OF ANY INFRARED ABSORPTION in the air. Specifically, the found the middle value of temperature at 1000 millibars on Earth is around 15ÂşC = 288K, so the comparing temperature on Venus, WITHOUT ANY GREENHOUSE EFFECT, ought to be 1.18 times that, or 339K. Yet, this is only 66ÂşC, the temperature we really find there from the temperature and weight profiles for Venus.
So there is no nursery impact. You have recently demonstrated that atmosphere science is totally wrong to suspect something. This is the embarrassment that such huge numbers of "specialists" in atmosphere science, and all the logical experts, won't confront. Tune in to the physicists that let you know there is no nursery impact; they know without going to the Venus information - and I am one of them. The proceeding with ineptitude on this fundamental point among such a significant number of researchers, for over a century, is stunning, and deplorable..</span>
-- When the ball is at the top, before it's dropped, it has potential energy above the equilibrium position.
Potential energy = (mass) x (gravity) x (height) = (mass) x (G) x (0.5)
As it passes through the equilibrium position, it has kinetic energy.
Kinetic energy = (1/2) x (mass) x (speed)²
How much kinetic energy does it have at the bottom ?
EXACTLY the potential energy that it started out with at the top !
THAT's where the kinetic energy came from.
So the two expressions for energy are equal.
K.E. at the bottom = P.E. at the top.
(1/2) x (mass) x (speed)² = (mass) x (G) x (0.5)
Divide each side by (mass) . . .
(the mass of the ball goes away, and has no effect on the answer !)
(1/2) x (speed)² = (G) x (0.5)
Multiply each side by 2 :
(speed)² = G
speed = √G = √9.8 = <u>3.13 meters per second</u>, regardless of the mass of the ball !
Explanation:
Correct. Air has an index of refraction of approximately 1, and the angle of incidence is 35°. The substance has an unknown index of refraction n, and the angle of refraction is 25°.
1 sin 35° = n sin 25°
n = 1.36
