Answer: (D) Clan culture
Explanation:
The clan culture is one of the type of friendly type corporate environment in an organization and it is also known as collaborative culture. Clan culture is one of the element of corporate clan culture model.
There are many types of advantage of clan culture in an organization are as follows:
- Clear communication
- Increase in company productivity
- Increase in organization growth
According to the question, Jason and the Jill are the owner of the company an they always encourage and also motivate their employees. They also try to increase the job satisfaction among the employees and they try to built the clan culture in the company.
Therefore, Option (D) is correct.
Because it is you will find the answer soon and hopefully I don’t know
Answer:
A) Indirect exporting
Explanation:
An indirect exporting strategy refers to selling to an intermediary business. The intermediary business is responsible for selling and distributing the product in their domestic market.
This is the easiest way of exporting since GHB will only be responsible for delivering the goods to the intermediary, and it will not need invest anything in the country. The intermediary assumes the risks of selling the goods directly to customers or using wholesale distributors.
The actions of the millions of producers is driven by self interest.
<h3>Who is a producer?</h3>
A producer is an individual or firm that makes goods and services for consumers. For example, a farmer who plants apples is a producer. Also, the owner of the lemonade stand is a producer.
The goal of a producer is to earn profits all things being equal. Profits is when total revenue is greater than total cost.
To learn more about profit, please check: brainly.com/question/26181966
Answer:
- I think Ben should encourage the Senior Management to call a multidisciplynary meeting and do some research.
Explanation:
<em>I think Ben is right</em>. Even though the statement is technically correct, it may mislead customers.
Customers may interpret the phrase "<em>no sugar added</em>" as if the product did not contain any sugar.
Thus, customers interested in drinking beverages without sugar at all might think they are "safe" consuming the smoothie beverage, when in reallity each <em>smoothie's bottle contains sugar 35 g of naturally occurring sugars from the fruit.</em>
Customers deserve to be certain on what they are buying, thus the labels must be a sincere help for them, and not ambiguos at all.
This is a "gray zone" and an example of what in ethics is called a dilema.
I think the decision should be shared by a wider team and based on some research.
I think Ben should encourage the Senior Management to call a multidisciplynary meeting, where the subject is widely discussed. Also, I would suggest Ben to do some research, look for precedents about labeling in the industry, and try to learn the opinion of the FDA about this sensitive matter.
