Answer: the correct answer is (c) a fallacious argument masquerading as valid.
Explanation:
Fallacious Argument.- An argument that sometimes fools human reasoning, but is not logically valid. It is crucial to remember that reasoning from definitions and facts to conclusions is fundamentally different from reasoning about definitions.
Answer:
1. the sun is the largest star is true. 2. the coolest stars are red true. 3. the brighter the star the bigger is false. 4. all stars are made out of gasses and are the same size and color is false. 5. a star's luminosity is the same as its apparent brightness is false.
Explanation:
Answer:conditioned response
Explanation:
According to classical conditioning, the conditioned response is a learned from a previously neutral stimulus.
For example if a dog is given food daily by whistling first to call it, over time the dog will associate whistling with food , then whistling is a conditioned stimulus which is associated with unconditioned stimulus which is food.
Conditioned response is learned whilst unconditioned response occurs naturally and automatic without prior learning such as a dog salivating at the taste of it food.
The answer is false. The Dawes Act fizzled in light of the fact that the plots were too little for manageable horticulture. The Native American Indians needed devices, cash, involvement or mastery in cultivating. The cultivating way of life was a total outsider lifestyle. The Dawes Severalty Act was marked by Grover Cleveland in 1887 with the expectation of absorbing Native Americans into the United States. To do this, tribal control of reservations was taken away and the land was conceded to people possessions.
People ( especially new parents.) instead of being consistent they only use punishment for things that originally they didn't pay attention to.
They could also use abusive words while punishing their child which is damaging and defeats the purpose of Discipline. Discipline isn't punishment. It's a word meaning To teach. Punishment just goes along with discipline if the child doesn't respond to the teaching.
DO NOT spank at the first offence the child commits. First, make sure they know what they did was wrong, second initiate a discussion on how it made you feel and what you expected of them. Forgive the first offence. Second offence, talk about how you told them last time and if they understood. Mild punishment ( time out, no TV whichever you wish.)
Third offence. Spanking. Ask them if they know what they did was wrong, find out and then deliver the punishment in a calm manner, not out of anger.
And don't say anything to them afterwards, leave them to have their cry and then come back after a bit and accept their apology and tell them you love them and that you want them to be happy and ask them if they're happy when they're good and obey you. They will see they can talk to you and that you're not unreasonable and that the punishments were not unexpected or out of anger.
99% of spankings are used because the parents are angry or because they don't know of any other solutions. I've seen good kids raised with spankings, and bad kids raised with spankings. Spankings is a Tool, the one using the tool is the one at fault for how they do it.
