A personal trouble
the practical skeptic core concepts in sociology by lisa j. mcintyre page 31
It went up. A lot. So say it increased significantly.
Answer:
Option C: FILIBUSTERING
Explanation:
filibustering is simply an a formal and public act or way of preventing a bill to be voted on in the senate debate. It usually entails an active serving senator taking the floor for debate and talks as long as he can, for, as long as a senator has the floor, the bill in question cannot be voted on.
It is only used in the senate due to the fact that the senate does not share a time limit on how long the bill can be debated on.
Answer:
They are all the right answer.
Explanation:
This is an opinion question, you can put any of them and you will get it right. I would put George Washington, if they ask why then say that you disagree with his policies.
The answer is "<span>It was a subtle way to make participants feel more or less confident."
</span>
When the arguments were solid, individuals who gestured or nodded their heads concurred with them more than individuals who shook their heads, on the grounds that the head nodders had more trust in the solid contentions that they heard, But when contentions were frail, head gesturing had the contrary impact, it gave individuals more certainty that the contentions they heard were powerless, making them less persuading.Thus we conclude from this that anything you can do to influence individuals to have more trust in your message will make it more compelling, as long as your contentions are solid.