All categories

3 years ago

Which planet moves faster in its orbit: jupiter or neptune? explain?

1 answer:

3 0

<span>Jupiter moves faster than neptune in its orbit. It is because jupiter is closer to sun than neptune. The time taken to move on the orbit depends upon the distance from the sun. The length of orbit increases with increasing the distance from the sun and hence the speed also varies accordingly.</span>

You might be interested in

An artist wants to create a metal sculpture using a mold so that his artwork can be readily mass produced. He wants his sculptur

lukranit [14]

Answer:NO

Explanation:

No the mold should not be of the same size as that of sculpture because the material from which molds is made may shrink or expand depending upon its properties .

For example grey cast iron shrinks on cooling.

We need to make mold bigger in general so that if there is a need of finishing it can be done easily without altering the size of sculpture.

5 0

3 years ago

A cannon of mass 6.43 x 103 kg is rigidly bolted to the earth so it can recoil only by a negligible amount. The cannon fires a 7

Nata [24]

Answer:

The velocity of the shell when the cannon is unbolted is 500.14 m/s

Explanation:

Given;

mass of cannon, m₁ = 6430 kg

mass of shell, m₂ = 73.8-kg

initial velocity of the shell, u₂ = 503 m/s

Initial kinetic energy of the shell; when the cannon is rigidly bolted to the earth.

K.E = ¹/₂mv²

K.E = ¹/₂ (73.8)(503)²

K.E = 9336032.1 J

When the cannon is unbolted from the earth, we apply the principle of conservation of linear momentum and kinetic energy

change in initial momentum = change in momentum after

0 = m₁u₁ - m₂u₂

m₁v₁ = m₂v₂

where;

v₁ is the final velocity of cannon

v₂ is the final velocity of shell

$v_1 = \frac{m_2v_2}{m_1}$

Apply the principle of conservation kinetic energy

$K = \frac{1}{2}m_1v_1^2 + \frac{1}{2}m_2v_2^2\\\\K = \frac{1}{2}m_1(\frac{m_2v_2}{m_1})^2 + \frac{1}{2}m_2v_2^2\\\\K = \frac{1}{2}m_2v_2^2(\frac{m_2}{m_1}) + \frac{1}{2}m_2v_2^2 \\\\K = \frac{1}{2}m_2v_2^2 (\frac{m_2}{m_1} + 1)\\\\2K = m_2v_2^2 (\frac{m_2}{m_1} + 1)\\\\v_2^2 = \frac{2K}{M_2(\frac{m_2}{m_1} + 1)} \\\\v_2^2 = \frac{2*9336032.1}{73.8(\frac{73.8}{6430} + 1)}\\\\$

$v_2^2 = 250138.173\\\\v_2 = \sqrt{250138.173} \\\\v_2 = 500.14 \ m/s$

Therefore, the velocity of the shell when the cannon is unbolted is 500.14 m/s

3 0

3 years ago

Suppose an oxygen molecule traveling at this speed bounces back and forth between opposite sides of a cubical vessel 0.17 m on a

Nastasia [14]

Answer: The last part of the question has some details missing which is ; (Assume that the molecule's velocity is perpendicular to the two sides that it strikes.) molecule v=482 m/s molecule momentum=2.56 x 10^(-23)

Explanation:

The momentum of the molecule is 2.56 x 10^(-23) .
Particle hits the wall and bounces.
Momentum is reversed. Change in momentum = impulse
This is Force x time.
Momentum change happens at a wall after each trip.

time required = distance /speed

= 0.17 X 2/(482 m/s)

Average force = impulse / time

= 2 x 482 x 2.56 x 10^(-23) / (0.17 x 2)

= 7.76 x 10^20N, is the average force the molecule exerts on one of the walls of the container.

3 0

4 years ago

If you calculate W, the amount of work it took to assemble this charge configuration if the point charges were initially infinit

sp2606 [1]

Answer:

W = 0×(kq2L)

Explanation:

We know that the work to assemble a charge configuration of two charges a distance r from each other is simply W = kq2/r

If we want to assemble three charges A, B, and C. It's necessary to consider the distances between them

WABC = kq2/(rAB + rAC + rBC)

So, to assemble four charges A, B, C, & D....

WABCD = kq2/(rAB + rAC + rAD + rBC + rBD + rCD)

Considering a square charge configuration with sides L, such as in figure attached A, B, & C are positive & D is negative

rAB = L

rAC = L√2

rAD = L (-)

rBC = L

rBD = L√2 (-)

rCD = L (-)

⇒ W = kq2/(L + L√2 + (-L) + L + (-L√2) + (-L)

⇒ ∴ W = 0 × (kq2/L)

This way, working through each option...

(a)

The positive charges are equidistant from each other at a distance of L.

rAB = L

rAC = L

rAD = ½L⋅sin(60) (-)

rBC = L

rBD = ½L⋅sin(60) (-)

rCD = ½L⋅sin(60) (-)

Wa = kq2/(3L - (3/2)L⋅(0.866))

⇒ ∴ Wa = (1/1.7) × (kq2/L) = (0.5879)× (kq2/L)

(b)

rAB = L

rAC = 2L

rAD = 3L (-)

rBC = L

rBD = 2L (-)

rCD = L (-)

Wb = kq2/(4L - 6L)

⇒ ∴ Wb = (-1/2) × (kq2/L) = (-0.5)× (kq2/L)

(c)

The factor doesn't matter, so Wc = 0 × (kq2/L)

In this case, the greater work is actually the less work. Therefore, the positive work represents the amount of work the system actually exhibits, that we don't have to do. If there is negative work, we have to make up that work in order to place the charges as desired.

This way, charge configuration (a) requires the least amount of work.

5 0

3 years ago

PLEASE HELP Due today!

BigorU [14]

So i believe is exercise:)

7 0

3 years ago