Answer:
The correct answer is $0,20.
Explanation:
The marginal cost, at each level of concrete production, indicates the costs we incurred in carrying out said production. Basically, it is an indicator that will allow us and help to make decisions regarding the preparation and production of goods and services.
In the previous case, the cost of buying two tacos for $ 75 each plus a $ 80 bedid is as follows:
Tacos: $ 75 * 2 = $ 1,50
Drink: $ 80
TOTAL = 2,30
For its part, the second option is priced at $ 2,50
Subtracting the results, the marginal cost is defined as follows:
$ 2,50 - $ 2,30 = $ 0,20
Based on the information given the amount of quick assets is $128,694.
Using this formula
Quick assets = Cash + Marketable securities + Accounts receivable
Where:
Cash=$16,106
Marketable securities=$37,992
Accounts receivable=$74,596
Let plug in the formula
Quick assets =$16,106 + $37,992+ $74,596
Quick assets = $128,694
Inconclusion the amount of quick assets is $128,694.
Learn more about quick assets here:brainly.com/question/11209470
Answer: User
Explanation: Becca has the role of the user of the new copier machines being purchased for their company, because although she isn't the one making the purchase, she is the one who has the duty to operate the machines on a daily basis.
Answer:
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $5 per bottle. Of this amount, the burden that falls on consumers is $3 per bottle, and the burden that falls on producers is $2 per bottle. True or False: The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been larger if the tax had been levied on producers.
Explanation:
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $5 ($3 + $2).
The burden on consumers is $3 ($9 - $6), which is the difference between the after-tax purchase price and the before-tax purchase price for consumers. This implies that the burden passed to consumers is $3 out of the total tax burden of $5.
The burden on producers is $2 ($6 - $4) which represents the difference between before-tax selling price and the after-tax selling price for the producers. This means that the burden passed to producers is $2 out of the total tax burden of $5.
If the tax burden were passed to the producers alone, the selling price would have been more than $11 ($6 + 5). This would have reduced demand for wine as consumers would have been forced to bear the total burden. This would have made the tax unequitable. This would have been the case unless demand is inelastic. That means that the total demanded is not sensitive to price increases.
