Answer:
<h2>Kelly is wrong, with this congruent parts, we can conclude that triangles are congruent.</h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
To demonstrate congruent triangles, we need to use the proper postulates. There are at least 5 postulates we can use.
- Angle-Angle-Side Theorem (AAS theorem).
- Hypotenuse-Leg Theorem (HL theorem).
- Side-Side-Side Postulate (SSS postulate).
- Angle-Side-Angle Postulate (ASA postulate).
- Side-Angle-Side Postulate (SAS postulate).
In this case, Kelly SAS postulate, because the corresponding sides-angles-sides are congruent, i.e., KL ≅ MN and LM ≅ KN, also, all corresponding angles are congruent.
So, as you can see, only using SAS postulate, the congruency can be demonstrated. (Refer to the image attached to see an example of SAS postulate)
Answer:
x = 15.7945
General Formulas and Concepts:
<u>Pre-Algebra</u>
Order of Operations: BPEMDAS
- Brackets
- Parenthesis
- Exponents
- Multiplication
- Division
- Addition
- Subtraction
Equality Properties
- Multiplication Property of Equality
- Division Property of Equality
- Addition Property of Equality
- Subtraction Property of Equality<u>
</u>
<u>Trigonometry</u>
- [Right Triangles Only] SOHCAHTOA
- [Right Triangles Only] sinθ = opposite over hypotenuse
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Step 1: Define</u>
<em>Identify variables</em>
Angle θ = 33°
Opposite Leg = <em>x</em>
Hypotenuse = 29
<u>Step 2: Find Angle</u>
- Substitute in variables [sine]: sin33° = x/29
- [Multiplication Property of Equality] Multiply 29 on both sides: 29sin33° = x
- Rewrite: x = 29sin33°
- Evaluate: x = 15.7945
The equation you would write would be:
2x+34=187<span />
Answer:
12 16 20. law of proportions
Answer: it's just a black screan
Step-by-step explanation:
