Answer: The more narrowly we define a market, the more elastic the demand for a product will be.
Explanation: Narrowly defined markets tend to have more elastic demand than broadly defined markets because it is easier to find close substitutes for narrowly defined goods.
For example, a broad category of food, has a fairly inelastic demand because there are no good substitutes for food while Vanilla flavoured ice cream, a very narrow category, has a very elastic demand because other flavors of ice cream (e. g Chocolate) are perfect substitutes for vanilla.
Answer:
B. those who lose from free trade are better organized than those who gain.
Explanation:
There is a bias in the political process against free trade because <u>those who lose from free trade are better organized than those who gain</u>.
Free trades are the business agreement between two or more countries to import or exports among these countries does not have tax duties to follow, which boast their relationship and economy of countries as people can get quality goods at very low cost from other nation, however, many domestic organized sectors the affected by the free trade as they lose customer and revenue. Therefore, free trade has a negative effect on the local producer, which causes bias in the political process against free trade.
I believe the answer u are looking for is c......You can use the reference to support your claim. however be careful that you still use updated information as well
Answer: three times as large
Explanation:
Economic order quantity will be calculated as follows:
EOQ = ✓(2DS/H)
D = Demand in units
Here S = Ordering cost = $10
H = Holding cost
Since S = $10
Therefore, EOQ will be:
= ✓(2DS/H)
= ✓(2 × 10 × D/ H)
= ✓(20D/H)
Since we're to increase the order cost from $10 per order to $90 per order, then EOQ will be:
Since S = $90
Therefore, EOQ will be:
= ✓(2DS/H)
= ✓(2 × 90 × D/ H)
= ✓(180D/H)
3✓20DH
The revised EOQ will then be 3 times as large.
Ethical persuasion<span> is defined as a person’s internal capability to understand others, care for them, respect, understand and be fair by hearing their viewpoints at the same time sharing his. It is an exchange 0f each others’ viewpoints to create resolutions. Therefore, a</span><span>n ethical persuasive argument is not a contradiction in terms, does not include evidence the sender can come up with, whether or not it's relevant, does not focus on how the audience’s action will benefit the sender but it focuses on being both truthful and nondeceptive. </span>
