Answer:
the solution is (2, -6)
Step-by-step explanation:
Substitute the second equation into the first, replacing y in the first:
2x - (-4x+2) = 10
Simplifying, we get:
2x + 4x - 2 = 10, or:
6x = 12, which yields x = 2.
Substituting 2 for x in the second equation yields y = -4(2) + 2 = 0, or y = -6
Then the solution is (2, -6).
The answer to this query is AA similarity postulate. <span>
<span>Because the triangles given are only similar in angle but
dissimilar in sides which makes it incongruent with respect to the sides, AA
similarity postulate is the exact answer.
SAS ASA are not possible answers. </span></span>
Answer:
You may just add 2 in the spot. Moreover, you get no solution.
Step-by-step explanation:
Hope this helped!
9514 1404 393
Answer:
-4 1/8
Step-by-step explanation:
Many people find it easier to factor out -1, then do the addition. The fractions need a common denominator before they can be added. A suitable denominator that is a multiple of both 4 and 8 is 8.
The fraction 1/4 = (1/4)(2/2) = (1·2)/(4·2) = 2/8.
__
So, the problem can be rewritten as ...
-(1 7/8 +2 2/8)
= -((1+2) +(7/8 +2/8))
= -(3 +9/8)
The fraction 9/8 is an improper fraction equal to 8/8 +1/8 = 1 1/8. Then the sum is ...
-(3 +1 1/8) = -4 1/8
Answer:
The numerator is 70.
Step-by-step explanation:
70% converts to the fraction of 70/100. Therefore, the numerator is 70.
Hope you have a great day,
Ginny
