1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Effectus [21]
3 years ago
15

What do immigration historins meman by uprooting?

History
1 answer:
motikmotik3 years ago
4 0
Migration, immigration and refugees today <span>
<span>
</span></span>

By: Linda B. Glaser,  Arts Sciences Communications
May 8, 2016

Migration is one of the major forces shaping the world today, with more than 60 million displaced people.

“Never in history have we seen this many simultaneous displacements across the globe and these people are not going home any time soon,” says Mostafa Minawi, assistant professor of history and Himan Brown Sesquicentennial Faculty Fellow. “This is a global population redistribution and it will hit us whether we like it or not.”

Although migration has always been a factor in world history, war, civil unrest, economic dislocation, and climate change are combining to create what some policymakers call “disposable” populations. “It’s in our interest to study migration, to ask, what are the policies that are uprooting populations?” says Maria Cristina Garcia, Howard A. Newman Professor of American Studies. “What are the consequences for those who are uprooted as well as for the host societies who are then going to have to accommodate them?”

Syrians refugees are currently attracting a great deal of attention, as a visible by-product of regional power struggles and a reminder to Americans of the threat ISIL terrorism poses, but Garcia emphasizes the importance of remembering that there are also migrant crises in Eritrea, Burundi, Libya and elsewhere.

Forced migration issues are the most urgent to address, and the most difficult, given the inconsistencies, inefficiencies, and inadequacies of global refugee and immigration policies. From 2010-2013, the Institute for Social Sciences conducted a collaborative project examining Immigration: Settlement, Integration and Membership. Participants included political scientists Michael Jones-Correa and Mary Katzenstein and anthropologist Vilma Santiago-Irizarry, as well as historians Richard Bensel, Derek Chang, and Garcia. The group examined labor markets, formation of policy, new gateway cities, and demographic shifts across the country.

“Students enroll in immigration courses because they are troubled by what they read in the news.  They want to understand who’s migrating to the US, and what the appropriate response should be to that migration," says Garcia. "They think the anti-immigrant discourses are unique to their day.  But when they study history, when they examine migration and policy over a longer period of time, they see patterns emerge. History, and the humanities in general, remind us to look for those patterns, to look for the similarities and the disjunctures, to see what conclusions we might reach.”

“Quantitative science looks at large numbers of people, what factors push lots of people to places and what factors pull them to a place," says Leslie Adelson, Jacob Gould Schurman Professor of German Studies. "For example, Germany now has big pull factors and Syria has big push factors. What humanists bring are the heightened attention to blind spots in categories we use in analysis and a heightened attention to how perceptions are formed and how they can be changed in productive and creative ways. Not just creating empathy for migrants, but acknowledging existing bonds for and among migrants, and forging new bonds.”


You might be interested in
What is the significance of the Interstate Commerce Act of 1887?
inn [45]

<u>Original Question</u><u><em>: What is the significance of the Interstate Commerce Act of 1887?</em></u>

<u></u>

<u>Answer: Choice (B)</u> or <u>The act established some of the first steps to allow congress to regulate interstate trade</u>

<u></u>

<u></u>

<em>Reason:</em>

  • <em>Choice (A) is incorrect because these laws were set up to regulate industries, not to ban certain monopolies</em>
  • <em>Choice (B) is correct because it was the first attempt by the government to implement rules to prevent railroads from setting up outlandish prices</em>
  • <em>Choice (C) is incorrect because this act didn't have any relation with the Apache Indians</em>
  • <em>Choice (D) is incorrect because this wasn't the first time that the US set up a law that influenced the economy</em>

<em />

Hope that helps!

8 0
1 year ago
How do you advise congress to approach the issue of federalism
lara31 [8.8K]

Answer:

i guess is c

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
ANSWER ASAP U GET BRAINLIEST ONLY RIGHT ANSWERS
ziro4ka [17]
The answer is C. As new colonists and explorers discovered the Americas, they also brought disease. This heavily impacted the American Indians as a majority of their population suffered from epidemics.
5 0
3 years ago
Explain how the Persians were not like the Assyrians or the Babylonians. Give at least one example from each culture. must be 12
kumpel [21]
While the Persians did enforce some rather retrospectively horrid punishments specifically punishing the Egyptian aristocracy by selling there daughters into slavery and killing their sons it is important to remember that everything from a historical perspective is realities. <span>the Assyrians on one hand once invited its enemy's over for a feast and served them their own son's head on a platter. then proceeded to rip out the eyeballs allowing them to live the rest of their lives with the last sight being the head of their sons.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The advantages the Americans during the revolutionary war
Vladimir79 [104]

Answer:

advantages the colonists had was the fact that American forces were fighting on their own ground. They knew the terrain, roads, mountain passes, and swamp lands of the colonies. British soldiers were largely foreign to the environment,and supplies and troops had to be shipped across the Atlantic Ocean

Explanation:

advantages the colonists had was the fact that American forces were fighting on their own ground. They knew the terrain, roads, mountain passes, and swamp lands of the colonies. British soldiers were largely foreign to the environment,and supplies and troops had to be shipped across the Atlantic Ocean

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Suppose Bill HR612 is currently in Congress. One thing you know about this bill is that it
    13·1 answer
  • What were some of the factors that allowed the Black Death to spread so quickly and with such deadly results?
    9·2 answers
  • The picture above is from the Mayan ruins at Chichen Itza. What do these ruins tell us about the Mayan people?
    6·1 answer
  • For which reason did Persia attract foreign interest in the early 1900s
    12·2 answers
  • PLEASE I NEED THESE SOMEONE! 6-10
    5·1 answer
  • Many reasons motivated Europeans to explore the Americas. They are often categorized into three categories: economic, political,
    9·2 answers
  • Do you trust the account in this government why or why not
    11·1 answer
  • What did Britain do in order to keep industrial secrets from the United States
    13·2 answers
  • What did the Pennsylvania State House later become known as?
    14·2 answers
  • What did southern democrats call former confederates who agreed with republicans that the south needed to change following the c
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!