Answer:
metals and minerals
Explanation:
The Canadian shield was the name of a region that is located in North-Eastern part of Canada. The water and soil quality in this region is generally unsuited for agriculture, but this area possess large quantity of metals and minerals
This made Canadian Shield became the major producer for mining related companies. (Especially producers of coppers, Gold, Nickels, Zinc, and Diamond.) This region alone accounted for more than 20% of Canadian's economy.
The correct answer is radio broadcasts stated that Tutsi were killing Hutu individuals and that Hutu individuals should protect themselves.
In the city of Kigali, the capital of Rwanda, members of the presidential guard organized the first persecutions against the moderate Tutsis and Hutus who formed the political opposition group in the country. In a short time, several radio stations were used to call on other members of the Hutu population to kill the “natural responsible” of that attack.
The spread of hatred has resulted in the formation of an unofficial militia called Interahamwe, which means "those who attack together". In just over three months, a terrible wave of violence took over the streets of Rwanda, killing 800,000 Tutsis. The conflict against government troops ended up being won by members of the FPR, who tried to establish a conciliatory regime.
Despite efforts, the killing and violence in Rwanda has caused some two million citizens to flee to the refugee camps formed in Congo. In this region, the problem between the Tutsi and Hutu ethnicities continued to develop in various situations of conflict. The current government of Rwanda, led by Tutsis, has carried out some invasions in Congo in search of some radical Hutu leaders.
Answer:
Inductive, weak
Explanation:
An inductive reasoning is the opposite of deductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning applies knowledge of past experiences and observations to form conclusions. The premise and conclusion goes "if this happened now... this must then happen". This type of reasoning moves from specific to general as opposed to deductive reasoning that moves from general to specific.
The argument in our question is also a fallacy. A fallacy is a faulty logic or weak argument. The argument is a fallacy of faulty generalization, the typical "jumping into conclusion".
They are usually able to benefit it when they are old enough to understand ( Ages 10 to 13 )
