Answer: The loser's card shows 6.
Explanation: Let's start by naming the first student A and the second student B.
Since the product of A and B are either 12, 15, or 18, let's list every single possibility, the first number being A's number and the second number being B's number.
1     12
1     15
1     18
2     6
2     9
3     4
3     5
3     6
4     3
5     3
6     2
6     3
9     2
12  1
15  1
18  1
Now, the information says that A doesn't know what B has, so we can immediately cross off all of the combinations that have the integer appearing once and once ONLY off, because if it happened once only, A would know of it straight away. Now, our sample space becomes much smaller.
1     12
1     15
1     18
2     6
2     9
3     4
3     5
3     6
6     2
6     3
Using this same logic, we know that we can cross off all of the digits that occur only once in B's column.
2     6
3     6
Now, A definitely knows what number B has because there is only one number left in B. Hence, we can conclude that the loser, B, has the integer 6.
        
             
        
        
        
Answer: First of all, we will add the options. 
A. Yes, because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
B. Yes, because the regression equation is based on a random sample.
C. Yes, because the association between length and weight is positive.
D. No, because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
E. No, because there may not be any 3-inch fish of this species in the pond.
The correct option is D.
Step-by-step explanation: It would not be appropriate to use the model to predict the weight of species that is 3 inches long because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
As we can see from the question, the model only accounts for species that are within the range of 0.75 to 1.35 inches in length, and species smaller or larger than that length have not been taken into consideration. Therefore the model can not be used to predict the weights of fishes not with the range accounted for.
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
The first statement: "Her first mistake was in Step 2. She added 0.2 to each term instead of multiplying by 0.2."
 
        
             
        
        
        
Hey
Question 1: For this one, we simply need to look at the "fat grams over 25" and the "Total" sections. We can see that 27 out of 50 have fat grams over 25. This written as a percentage is: 54%
Question 2: Using the same logic above we conclude the answer is 45.45%
Question 3: For this we need to look at the "total" section and the answer is 50
Question 4: We add all the "over 300" and write it as a percentage out of 50 which is 14%
Question 5: Same as #1 answer is 21%
Hope this helps
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:

Third answer is correct.
Step-by-step explanation:

hope this helps you.