Which statement best explains whether these ordered pairs represent a function? (-4, 2) (6, 7) (-8, 3) (9, 10) (12, 14) (6, 9)
1 answer:
Answer:
These ordered pairs does NOT represent a function.
Step-by-step explanation:
One of the x-values repeast (6), which is not a characteristic of a function. Because so, it also does not pass the vertical line test because it would pass through the points twice.
You might be interested in
Answer:
Abby is the answer
Step-by-step explanation:
When you calculate Abby’s free throws you should realize
40 - 36 = 4
However with Alex’s free throws you calculate
60 - 54 = 6
When you compare the two Abby has a higher percentage of attempts because she was more successfu!
Step-by-step explanation:
To make the coefficient of x equal we can multiply both sides of (1) by 2. the answer is B
If stock prices are falling that’s a good time to buy
The average of those two values is-(15/2) +(5/2)i
Gg easy
remember
(x^m)/(x^n)=x^(m-n)
and
(x^m)^n=x^(mn)
and
(xyz)^m=(x^m)(y^m)(z^m)
and
(m/n)^a=(m^a)/(n^a)
and
x^-n=1/(x^n)
so
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=