3 years ago

Which statement best explains whether these ordered pairs represent a function? (-4, 2) (6, 7) (-8, 3) (9, 10) (12, 14) (6, 9)

Mathematics

1 answer:

Tresset [83]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

These ordered pairs does NOT represent a function.

Step-by-step explanation:

One of the x-values repeast (6), which is not a characteristic of a function. Because so, it also does not pass the vertical line test because it would pass through the points twice.

You might be interested in

-HELP QUICK!!- What is the distance from P to Q? <br><br> A P E X

skad [1K]

Answer:

might be 7

Step-by-step explanation:

count the rise and run from Q to P. count up 3 and right 4.

5 0

2 years ago

I need help plssssss

Andrew [12]

Answer:

i cant see the image?

Step-by-step explanation:

if someone can please tell me what is shows

4 0

2 years ago

Take my points since im quitting

ValentinkaMS [17]

Answer:

thanks:)

Step-by-step explanation:

hehe

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which is better for music SteelSeries arcits pro wireless vs v-moda crossfade wireless

LUCKY_DIMON [66]

Answer:

SteelSeries arcits pro wireless

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Determine the product<br> (4.2x100). (5.7x100)

Tom [10]

Answer:

(4.2x100).(5.7x100) = 239.400

Step-by-step explanation:

We need to determine the product of (4.2x100).(5.7x100).

We know that when two numbers are multiplied together, the product is the same regardless of the order of the multiplicands. For that reason, we can multiply all together, and the result will be the same regardless of the order of the multiplicands:

Then:

(4.2x100).(5.7x100) = 4.2x100x5.7x100 = 420x570= 239.400

7 0

3 years ago