If I'm correct both of the answers are A.
The answer is 1. 4 is incorrect because you can't really decrease the mass of the driver. 3 is incorrect because accelerating the driver would cause more damage than not. 2 is incorrect because decreasing the distance would only cause more damage. 1 is correct because by increasing the length of time the force acts on the driver helps reduce the speed of the driver and cause the drive to sustain less injuries. Hope that helps.
Answer:
d. 6.0 m
Explanation:
Given;
initial velocity of the car, u = 7.0 m/s
distance traveled by the car, d = 1.5 m
Assuming the car to be decelerating at a constant rate when the brakes were applied;
v² = u² + 2(-a)s
v² = u² - 2as
where;
v is the final velocity of the car when it stops
0 = u² - 2as
2as = u²
a = u² / 2s
a = (7)² / (2 x 1.5)
a = 16.333 m/s
When the velocity is 14 m/s
v² = u² - 2as
0 = u² - 2as
2as = u²
s = u² / 2a
s = (14)² / (2 x 16.333)
s = 6.0 m
Therefore, If the car had been moving at 14 m/s, it would have traveled 6.0 m before stopping.
The correct option is d
Answer:
larger atomic radii because they are on the far left, the s-block, of the periodic table. -The ionic radii increase as you go down groups on the periodic table. -Lithium and Beryllium are not examples of this trend because they are both in 2s.
I believe the answer is B: It’s moving at a constant speed.