Answer:
Target sales revenue = $7,830,000
Explanation:
given data
target price = $270
annual target sales volume = 29,000
target operating income = 40%
to find out
Target sales revenue
solution
we will get here Target sales revenue that is express as
Target sales revenue = target price × annual target sales volume .................1
put here value we get
Target sales revenue = $270 × 29000
Target sales revenue = $7,830,000
Answer:
If Bread and Butter Bakers meet their sales goal, their net profit per month is $11,500
Explanation:
Bread and Butter plans to use 10,000 pounds of flour per month at a price of $2.00 per pound with an additional variable expense per loaf of $1.50. They hope to sell 10,000 loaves of bread.
Total variable expense = 10,000 x $2.00 + 10,000 x $1.50 = $35,000
Total sales = 10,000 x $6.00 = $60,000
Net profit = Total sales - Total variable expense - fixed costs = $60,000 - $35,000 - $13,500 = $11,500
Answer:
The correct answer here is d.
Explanation:
Real wage is the nominal wages adjusted for price changes. It reflects the purchasing power earned by the workers.
There will be a direct and positive relationship between real wages and number of workers who are willing to work. This means when there is an increase in the real wages, more workers will be willing to work because they will be earning more. Reverse will be the situation in case of reduced real wages.
Depending on the location if the house and how much you want to sell it for. Just make sure basic things such as Holes in wall’s are fixed or more noticeable details. Otherwise if the house is in good shape and appliances, heating, water are all fine then not a lot.
Answer:
These are the options for the question:
- Breach of duty.
- Strict liability.
- Recklessness.
- Negligence per se
And this is the correct answer:
Explanation:
Negligence per se consist in act that is neglectful, or unlawful, because it explicitely violates a statue or regulation.
In this case, the statue was the new state law that required smoke detectors to be maintained. The company that installed the smoke detector inside Jose's house clearly did not maintain the detector because otherwise, it would have gone off when the fire started, and Jose probably would not have died.
It is a negligence per se from the smoke detector company, and Jose's wife can lawfully sue them for that very reason.
