Answer:
(Hope this helps can I pls have brainlist (crown)☺️)
Explanation:
Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) is an acronym that stands for Environmental, Social, and Governance. These non-financial aspects are increasingly being used by investors in their analytical process to identify major dangers and growth prospects.
The goal of this research is to use ESG integration to produce new types of competitive advantage, not only ESG ratings. It can't be left exclusively to the investor relations team or the sustainability department since it includes key strategic and operational decisions.
Answer:
Global economic crimes consist of a wide range of economic offenses and include different forms of financial crimes that are committed. Examples of global economic crimes are money laundering, tax evasion, improper use of tax havens, embezzlement and bribery etc.
Global economic fraud is a sub set of global economic crime and consists of those actions that are considered as an intentional act of deception for the purpose of making financial gains. A dishonest advantage is gained through acts of global economic fraud. Examples of global economic frauds are identity fraud, banking fraud, investment fraud, and fraud by abuse of position.
Companies should be concerned about global crimes and frauds as these acts of crime and fraud may put companies in a position of disadvantage in the long run. These acts will dilute some of the value creation activities that companies are pursuing and in the long run these acts will prove detrimental to the value creation objectives of companies. Further the acts of crime and fraud increase the risk scenario in which companies operate and hence the chances of losing money increase manifold.
Companies should address the issue of fraud and crime in a tangible manner and approach to tackle them on a heads on basis. To address the issues companies should firstly recognize fraud when they first see and encounter it. For this companies will require robust fraud risk assessment framework in place. When motivations are identified beforehand then better controls will be put in place by companies, thus significantly reducing the chances of fraud and crime.
The marginal benefit that gained by reducing pollution should be more than marginal cost used to reduce pollution.
Explanation:
In order to reduce the net cost for pollution reduction the marginal benefit should be more than marginal cost. If the marginal benefit is more than marginal cost then it will be good for the society . Marginal benefit reduces when there is increase in consumption , when the marginal cost is more than marginal benefit which means by consuming one extra unit the consumer is not getting the satisfaction.
Answer:
45,000 × 25/100= 11,250
Now we add 15% to 20% =35%
13,000 × 35/100 = 4,550
Taxable income = 133,050 + 11,250 = $144,300
Tax liability = 11, 250 already calculated
Tax savings will be 4,550 + 133,050 = 137, 600
