Answer:
5%
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Present value of the company, PV = $300,000
Current Profits, π₀ = $11,000
Interest rate, i = 9% = 0.09
Now,
we know,
here,
g is the growth rate
on rearranging, we get
g = 
on substituting the respective values, we get
g = 
or
g = 0.05
or
g = 0.05 × 100%
= 5%
Answer:
The correct answer is Voice.
Explanation:
Taking into account the framework of exit, voice, loyalty and negligence, voice means directly raising comments on a particular situation that influences within the work team, so that superiors are aware of situations and can ask themselves solutions for the benefit of all.
Answer:
The computations are shown below:
Explanation:
a. The computation of the economic order quantity is shown below:
= 229 units
The carrying cost is come from
= $2.40 × 20%
b. Time between placement of orders is
= Economic order quantity ÷Annual demand
= 229 ÷ 280
= 0.8179 years
So,
= 0.8179 × 365 days
= 298.53 days
We assume 365 days in a year
c. The average annual cost of ordering cost and carrying cost equals to
= Holding cost + ordering cost
= (Economic order quantity ÷ 2 × Holding cost) + (Annual demand ÷ Economic order quantity × ordering cost)
= (229 units ÷ 2 × $0.48) + (280 ÷ 229 units × $45)
= $54.96 + $55.02
= $109.98
d)
Now the reorder level is
= Demand × lead time + safety stock
where, Demand equal to
= Expected demand ÷ total number of weeks in a year
= 280 pounds ÷ 52 weeks
= 5.38461
So, the reorder point would be
= 5.38461 × 3 + $0
= 16.15 pounds
Answer:
the minimum price it should charge is $40 per unit.
Explanation:
Minimum Transfer Price = Variable Costs - Internal Savings + Opportunity Cost
<em>Note : Division A has capacity available to meet B's requirements therefore there is no opportunity cost</em>.
There are Internal savings of $5 as A's variable costs will be $5 less per unit.
Minimum Transfer Price = $45 - $5
= $40
Answer:
The right approach is Option a (supply of the good).
Explanation:
- Supply would increase substantially of some more production. Increasing the income of established businesses wouldn’t rise, as there has been increasing competitiveness.
- This similar value of the product is likely to decline due to further fulfillment as well as the same requirement. Marginal costs would never be compromised.
Anyone else alternatives possible does not apply to the situation throughout the question. That's the right thing above.
