I'm pretty sure it is: " D) None of the above "
Answer:
<u><em>C : The Government. </em></u>
Explanation:
In a command economy, <u>the government </u>controls major aspects of economic production. The government decides the means of production and owns the industries that produce goods and services for the public. The government prices and produces goods and services that it thinks benefits the people.
Answer:
to diversify farming crops so the state didn’t rely solely on cotton
to attract investors from the North to build mills and factories in Georgia
Explanation:
The Bourbon Democrats were a subgroup of the Democratic party, which supported conservative ideas and had an interest in acting mainly in the south of the country.
The strongest goals of this subgroup were aimed at Georgia. This is because the members of this group wanted to make Georgia more independent from the northern states, expanding this independence to other states later on. For them, this independence should be achieved with agricultural diversity, growing crops in addition to cotton and through the investment of industries in the Georgian territory.
Answer: Homogamy
Explanation:
Homogamy is defined as creation of link and connection between people who persist particular cultural manner which makes them similar to each other in some way. The formation of bond is based on classified mating .The groups that are formed through homogamy are based on ethics, culture, religion, gender, class etc.
According to the situation mentioned in question, JDate is used by Jewish people for the purpose of homogamy because they tend to make relationships based on non-Jew practicing people or who live far from Jew areas.They are thus searching for minorly non-Jewish cultural background people.
Answer:
The North American fur trade, an aspect of the international fur trade, was the acquisition, trade, exchange, and sale of animal furs in North America. Indigenous peoples and Native Americans of various regions of the present-day countries of Canada and the United States traded among themselves in the pre–Columbian era. Europeans participated in the trade from the time of their arrival to Turtle Island, commonly referenced as the New World, extending the trade's reach to Europe. The French started trading in the 16th century, the English established trading posts on Hudson Bay in present-day Canada during the 17th century, while the Dutch had traded by the same time in New Netherland. The North American fur trade reached its peak of economic importance in the 19th century and involved the development of elaborate trade networks.

A fur trader in Fort Chipewyan, North-West Territories in the 1890s.
The fur trade became the main economic driver in North America, attracting competition among the French, British, Dutch, Spanish, Swedes and Russians. Indeed, in the early history of the United States, capitalizing on this trade and removing the British stranglehold over it, was seen[by whom?] as a major economic objective. From the 16th century, many indigenous societies across the continent came to depend on the fur trade as their primary source of income. By the middle of the 19th century, changing fashions in Europe brought about a collapse in fur prices. The American Fur Company and some other companies failed. Many Native American communities were plunged into long-term poverty and consequently lost much of the political influence they once had.
The trade and subsequent killings of beavers were devastating for the local beaver population. The natural ecosystems that came to rely on the beavers for dams, water and other vital needs were also devastated leading to ecological destruction, environmental change, and drought in certain areas. Following this beaver populations in North America would take centuries to recover in some areas, while others would never recover.[1][2][3]
