Answer: yes! Aww thanks, you too :))
Explanation: have a great day!!
Answer:
Follows are the solution to the given points:
Explanation:
In point a:
It must allocate
for both the taxicab and
for the rest of the license, the client list, and the company name registered.
Its cost of intangible material could be amortized for 180 months starting in April.
is her amortization deduction.
She could also use Section 179 to decrease her taxable money to
but include her deduction.
Her taxable annual income is
.
In point b:
They must allocate
for the taxi and
for their licenses, the customer list as well as the business by interacting with people register. Its cost of the material could be depreciated for 180 months, starting in April.
is her amortization deduction.
The taxable income here 
Section 179 could be requested if another income is earned on the tax return (such as W-2 wages).
As all Section 179 is unpaid with other earned income, it is carried forward into the next year.
Answer:
B. False
Explanation:
Flotation costs are cost that are concerned with issuing new common stock. It is the amount of money or cost incurred by an organization when offering its securities to the public. The cost may include legal fees, auditing fees and registration fees. When the flotation cost goes higher, firms are more likely to use debts rather than preferred stock. This is simply because debt is lesser than both common stock and preferred stock. Also, its fallacy to think that preferred stock doesnt have flotation cost. Its only that its not as high as the ones for new common equity.
Answer:
Hi
Explanation:
it honestly depends try reloading or refreshing or poking on other sites that LOOK APPROPRIATE
Answer:
(a) It will have multiple IRRs
(b) The MIRR calculated is 10.18% . Going by MIRR result , this project will only generate returns that is equal to cost of capital(10%) .If there are other avaible more viable projects, it should be rejected ( Please see attached computation).
Explanation:
(a) The multiple IRRs occurs when cash flows change sign and result in more than one value for the IRR.
Application of IRR to value an investment is only suitable when the project has normal cash flows, i.e a negative initial cash flow (i.e initial investment) followed by a series of positive cash flows.
In this scenario, we have negative cash flow of $6m in year 4 which occured after positive cash flow of $3.5m per year from year 1 to 3. This typically make IRR unreliable. To overcome this limitation , we can use Modified Internal Rate of Return (MIRR)
(b) Please see attached for more details.