LeBron James is one of the best basketball players in the country, was selected by the Cleveland Cavaliers as the first pick in the 2003 NBA draft, signing a three-year contract worth almost $13 million, with an option for a fourth year at $5.8 million. Had he decided to attend college instead, James would have incurred an opportunity cost of at least $19 million in forgone income to earn a four-year college degree.
Opportunity cost is the value you would gain or lose if you choose a different path or solution. The opportunity cost in this scenario is deciding to play in the NBA since college was too expensive. LeBron James ultimately saved time and money by taking the detour because he received a contract worth close to $13 million; otherwise, he would have had to pay more and spend more time attending a four-year college.
LeBron's decision to join the NBA right after high school graduation has an opportunity cost because he might have attended a four-year university or college instead. He was chosen by the Cleveland Cavaliers as the first overall choice in the 2003 NBA Draft
To learn more about Opportunity cost here,
brainly.com/question/13036997
#SPJ4
Answer:
C. Sell a straddle
Explanation:
Considering the following calculation: Sell a straddle = sell a put + sell a call
and,
Premium income for selling a straddle = (P + C )100 = ($3 + $4)(100) = $700.
a short straddle involves simultaneously selling a put option and call option with the same underlying asset, same exercise price and expiration date
By Selling a 3 month put option with exercise price of $40 one will get $3 (inflow of $3)
Simulatenously By Selling a 3 month call option with exercise of $40 one wiil get $4(inflow of $4)
Thus the total premium income of selling a straddle is $7
It is know as extracurricular activities
To get the growth rate, we will follow the Gordon Growth modelP= D/(K-G)whereP= stock value=$68D= Expected dividend=$3.85G= Growth rateK= required rate of returnG =K-(D/P)Substitute the given valuesG= 0.11-(3.85/68)
G= 5.34%The growth rate for stock required is 5.34%
Answer:
a. continue with the project provided that the additional solar electricity is worth more than $10 million.
Explanation:
It is provided that after cost overruns of the project is $10 million, which can never be recovered, thus, it is a kind of sunk cost.
Sunk cost is the cost which is made previously, and now in no manner will affect the decision, as cannot be recovered.
Therefore, such cost is ignored.
Further provided additional cost will be $12 million, therefore, now the society shall make a rational choice whether to continue the project providing solar electricity of $10 million, as in case of amount of solar energy is $32 million or $22 million, then the choice is obvious to accept,
Rational choice will be for solar electricity worth $10 million.
Therefore, correct statement is
a. continue with the project provided that the additional solar electricity is worth more than $10 million.