That kind of fallacy is called Argumentum ad Hominem. It means the argument is addressed to the person; attacking that person instead the issue. There is an irrelevance because the argument is against to the person making a claim, rather against to the claim itself. An example is judging a person's social status or attitude, like calling his strategies aren't effective to finish a certain task because of his untidiness and laziness.
Answer:
Cross-sectional research method
Explanation:
The Cross-sectional research method is a method of observational study design. Here, in this study the experimenter or the researcher measures and studies the outcome and and exposures in the study participants in the same time.
In the context, An experimenter studies the heredity and the intelligence of the MZ twins who are reared together and for those who are reared apart. The findings of the experiment made by the researcher is a result of a cross sectional research method in this case.
Answer:
Nepal has had a monarchy for most of its history. Nearly 16,000 people were killed in Nepal's civil war against the monarchy from 1996 to 2006. The Maoists ended ten years of civil war in 2006 and joined the peace process in Nepal. In 2008, the monarchy was overthrown by the Nepal Constituent Assembly and a federal multi-party democratic republic was established.
<em>hope that help you</em>
hey fail to understand the past and current ecology of the place, its wildlife, politics and people. And this can lead to failure. Studies have shown, for instance, that conservation groups often fail to look into past patterns of human population densities in and around proposed protected area
Answer:
During WWII women worked in factories producing munitions, building ships, aeroplanes, in the auxiliary services as air-raid wardens, fire officers and evacuation officers, as drivers of fire engines, trains and trams, as conductors and as nurses.
Explanation:
