1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Bogdan [553]
3 years ago
8

To belong to a group is to yield to others the right to make certain decisions about our behavior.

Social Studies
2 answers:
Anton [14]3 years ago
8 0

Answer: Well no, not at all.

Explanation: Beign part of a group obviously comes with certain rights and responsabilities.

The one and only goal you have to have in mind is the common mission of the group. Besides of that, everything passes to second term. And of course, feedback and teamwork are an elemental part of a groupo but that doesn´t mean that all of your team members has the right to make decissions about your behavior. Opinions, at most.

m_a_m_a [10]3 years ago
7 0
It seems that you have missed the necessary options for us to answer this question so I had to look for it. Anyway, the answer for this would be TRUE. It is true that to <span> belong to a group is to yield to others the right to make certain decisions about our behavior. Hope this helps.</span>
You might be interested in
How did the practices of ancient Israelites set them apart from other ancient peoples?
Daniel [21]

Answer:

They worshipped one god, not many gods.

Explanation:

The religious beliefs that made the Hebrews different from the other ancient people was that they believed in one all-powerful God and not many Gods. ... The Hebrews believed in monotheism but others believed in polytheism. Monotheism. The belief in one all-powerful God who established moral laws for humanity.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the 1950s, television shows typically were interrupted by advertisements by about 10 different companies,
Westkost [7]

Answer:

It is true. In the 1950s, television shows typically were actually interrupted by advertisements by about 10 different companies.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which is which?
iren [92.7K]

Answer:

China is an autocratic government today.

Japan is a democratic goverenment today.

Mongolia is a democratic govenment today.

Taiwan is a democratic goverenment today.

Explanation:

China functions as a socialist republic governed by a single party, communist, led by a general secretary.

Japan is a monarchy by the constitution, with the emperor in its entirety, or the emperor having ceremonial duties only.

Mongolia is Republic with a multiparty system. The President and the Government have the highest power.

Taiwan's political status is uncertain because China does not recognize it and it claims to be its territory.

7 0
3 years ago
Isn't it a bit ironic that executives found guilty of criminal activity could serve less time in prison if their firm has develo
lisov135 [29]

Answer? 1) Yes, it is a bit ironic. If a company has an Ethics program that's comprehensive enough, executives should not have to be caught in business criminal activities.

2.) First let's talk about Ethics programs. These are basically programs that embody the business philosophies of a company such that every stakeholder understand how business is run in the company. It basically defines to employees, staff, investors, vendors and customers the rules of Business Ethics as defined by the firm, from the maximum amount of tips to collect from customers to how intimate employees get with clients so that there's no confusion. Now, all this is to clarify but the question here is how effective was the program if criminal activity was discovered? It's simple. The most comprehensive Ethics programs can't control human circumstantial behaviour. As clear as rules may be, they are always still broken. And this is because, with humans, there an infinite number of things to put into consideration, most of which won't always follow rules. One may be 100% compliant with said rules but find themselves weak to give in at some point for any possible reason the person deemed more important than upholding the companies ethics. In other words, these rules are held by the people it binds and the delivery will always be subjective. Whenever it is deemed unfavorable to uphold, it most likely will be dropped.

Therefore, it might have been the most effective and comprehensive Ethics program in the world but only as effective as the executives demmed it subjectively.

8 0
3 years ago
When was the Constitution
Anna35 [415]

Answer:

The constitution was written on September 17, 1787 during a constitutional convention it conveyed from May 25 to September 17, 1787 it was also signed on September of 1787

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The illiad and the odyssey are important sources of information about
    13·2 answers
  • What are Non-governmental organisations?
    15·1 answer
  • What aspects of the New Deal, if any, do you see in American society today?
    5·1 answer
  • What is a land bridge
    14·1 answer
  • How do we regulate interest groups and lobbying activity what are the goals of these regulations?
    15·1 answer
  • Select the appropriate conclusion from Stanley Milgram's experiment on authority and the infliction of suffering.
    15·2 answers
  • Select all that apply. A narrative: _____. proves a point must be told from first-person POV does not require a narrator uses de
    11·1 answer
  • Keeping a city clean is not only a responsibility of the local civic body but also of the citizens. Mention any two ways in whic
    6·1 answer
  • You have been given a piece of evidence indicating that plant and animal life is scarce in this environment. Identify this envir
    9·1 answer
  • Where was Dr. King's famous march that took place in 1963 when he spoke in front of approximately 250,000 people?
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!