The answer to this is 4/3
Answer:
D
Step-by-step explanation:
positive but not linear due to straight lines and inconsistency
So far, Jackie has read 217 pages
In order to determine the total number of pages Jackie read, we would have to determine the number of pages she read each day and add these pages together
- Number of pages she read on Monday =
x 252 = 126 pages - Number of pages she read on Tuesday = 28 pages
- Number of pages she read on Wednesday =
x 252 = 63 pages
The total number of pages she has read so far = 126 + 28 + 63 = 217 pages
A similar question was solved here: brainly.com/question/24708342?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
a. The data should be analyzed using paired samples because the economist made two measurements (samples) drawn from the same pair of identical cards. Each data point in one sample is uniquely paired to a data point in the second sample.
b. A pair is made up of two identical cards where one would go into Dutch auction and the other to the first-price sealed bid auction.
c. The explanatory variables are the types of online auction which are the Dutch auction and the first price sealed bid auction. The explanation variable here is categorical: the Dutch auction and the first price sealed bid auction.
d. The response variable which is also known as the outcome variable is prices for the 2 different auction for each pair of identical cards. This variable is quantitative.
e. Null Hypothesis in words: There is no difference in the prices obtained in the two different online auction.
Alternative hypothesis: There is a difference in the prices obtained in the two different online auction.
f. The parameter of interest in this case is the mean prices of pairs of identical cards for both auction and is assigned p.
g. Null hypothesis: p(dutch) = p(first-price sealed auction)
Alternative hypothesis: p(dutch) =/ p(first-price sealed auction)
h. Assuming the p-value is 0.17 at an assed standard 0.05 significance level, our conclusion would be to fail to reject the null hypothesis as 0.17 is greater than 0.05 or even 0.01 and we can conclude that, there is no statistically significant evidence to prove that there is a difference in the prices obtained in the two different online auction.
In order to solve the problem, you must give the coordinates of points E and F. without the coordinates this problem cant be solved. for the mean time, i will give you the formula on how to solve the problem.
x = x1 + ( 2/3 )*( x2 - x1)
y = y1 + ( 2/3 )*( y2 - y1)
where x1 and y1 are the coordinates of point E
while x2 and y2 are the coordinates of pont F
