Answer:
We can make recommendations and conclusions about gender-based violence for our peers.
Regarding the recommendations, we can present arguments such as: A person should not be judged based on their gender, but on their actions and skills, we should not respond to any situation with violent acts, but with kindness and respect, every living being deserves to be respected and treated with consideration.
In relation to conclusions, we can present arguments such as: Everyone has the same rights and duties regardless of their genre, color, sexual orientation and religion. They should not be treated violently because of any of these factors.
Explanation:
Gender-based violence is characterized by the fact that one group of people (usually women) becomes the target of violence by another group of people because of their gender. This is because the aggressors see these victims as inferior and weak, who must be submissive to the wills that the aggressors have and must be punished as they see fit.
A political viewpoint that favors native inhabitants over immigrants is the best description of a Nativist.
Option 1
<h3><u>Explanation:</u></h3>
A nativist by definition is a person or a public viewpoint that favors the provision of better privileges and rights to native residents and inhabitants of an area as opposed to immigrants who merely shifter to the area. A nativist is not a politician related to and favoring only Roman Catholics to office as it relates to all natives and not just Roman Catholics.
A Nativist isn’t necessarily cruel but every cruel leader isn’t a Nativist. A Native American activist is also a decent description but a native activist need not support natives exclusively, just because he is native, making option 1 the best answer.
It was first celebrated in Canada, in 1882. It was brought to the US by the travelers from Canada and it became a national holiday in Canada in 1894.
<span>either assimilated or rejected... i believe its this :)</span>
Answer:
please ask full questions
