Answer:
(- 9, - 9)
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the 2 equations
3x - 4y = 9 → (1)
- 3x + 2y = 9 → (2)
Adding (1) and (2) will eliminate the term in x
(1) + (2) term by term
(3x - 3x) + (- 4y + 2y) = (9 + 9)
0 - 2y = 18
- 2y = 18 ( divide both sides by - 2 )
y = - 9
Substitute y = - 9 into (1) or (2) and evaluate for x
(1) → 3x + 36 = 9 ( subtract 36 from both sides )
3x = - 27 ( divide both sides by 3 )
x = - 9
Solution is (- 9, - 9)
Answer:
So therefore, the diameter is 36 inches
Step-by-step explanation:
first you would divide by 2, which is 56.52
(about) then divide by pi and you get 18.
so multiply 18 by 2 and you get 36.
Answer:
The answer is 36
Step-by-step explanation:
First solve in parenthesis; 4-1=3
Then multiply that by the 2 to get 6
Then raise that value by the square root of 6^2 = 36
Answer: Phillip is correct. The triangles are <u>not </u>congruent.
How do we know this? Because triangle ABC has the 15 inch side between the two angles 50 and 60 degrees. The other triangle must have the same set up (just with different letters XYZ). This isn't the case. The 15 inch side for triangle XYZ is between the 50 and 70 degree angle.
This mismatch means we cannot use the "S" in the ASA or AAS simply because we don't have a proper corresponding pair of sides. If we knew AB, BC, XZ or YZ, then we might be able to use ASA or AAS.
At this point, there isn't enough information. So that means John and Mary are incorrect, leaving Phillip to be correct by default.
Note: Phillip may be wrong and the triangles could be congruent, but again, we don't have enough info. If there was an answer choice simply saying "there isn't enough info to say either if the triangles are congruent or not", then this would be the best answer. Unfortunately, it looks like this answer is missing. So what I bolded above is the next best thing.
Step-by-step explanation:
and 
are linear pair angles.
