1. Break down of Food into Energy 
Oxygen
2. Absorb X - Rays in Bones Calcium
3. Cell Membrane Function Sodium
4. All Organic Compounds Carbon
An ecosystem is a geographic area where plants, animals, and the other organisms work for the existence of bubble life.
<h3>
Variation of ecological habitats within a species is characteristic of which type of diversity?</h3>
The variation of ecological habitats within a specie is character of the type of diversity is known as Ecosystem Diversity.
Ecosystem is defined as the different kinds of habitats, ecological processes and communities. A biological community is defined by the specie which occupy a specific area and the interactions between the species.
So we can conclude that: An ecosystem is a geographic area where plants, animals, and the other organisms work for the existence of bubble life.
Learn more about Ecological Habitat here: brainly.com/question/7413811
#SPJ1
Answer:
Hello YOU!
Explanation:
Phrenology was a science of character divination, faculty psychology, theory of brain and what the 19th-century phrenologists called "the only true science of mind."Phrenology came from the theories of the idiosyncratic Viennese physician Franz Joseph Gall (1758-1828).
Gall believed that the bumps and uneven geography of the human skull were caused by pressure exerted from the brainunderneath. He divided the brain into sections that corresponded to certain behaviors and traits that he called fundamental faculties. This is referred to as localization of function.
Phrenology is considered pseudoscience today, but it was actually a vast improvement over that era's prevailing views of personality. ... But phrenology may be undergoing a redemption of sorts. Not the skull part—that's still considered bunk.
Phrenology was particularly popular in the U.S. because it fit so well with the idea of the American dream–the notion that we can accomplish our goals despite a humble heritage. Spurzheim believed that the brain was like a muscle that could be exercised.
Answer:
The article is not reflecting current knowledge.
Explanation:
Rick Potts had explained some thing which has already been established and published several years back by various scientist, researchers, biologist, ecologists and geologist.
Re publishing something again will not bring laurel to Pott, instead his article would not be considered a suitable article for reference.
Also , if Pott would have published any thing that talks of a way ahead of those previous publication, even then his article could be referred.
