Answer: Employment and residential stability
Explanation:
Answer:
The Court ruled in Schenck v. United States (1919) that speech creating a “clear and present danger” is not protected under the First Amendment. This decision shows how the Supreme Court's interpretation of the First Amendment sometimes sacrifices individual freedoms in order to preserve social order. In Schenck v.
Explanation:
I believe the answer is: Pontiac
At that time, Native American tribes were banned from occupying The Great lakes region by the british empire.
Even though not many historians acknowledge this, In 1763, he led a group of revolutionaries to eliminate British influence in this region, which later know as the Battle of the Bloody Run.
