Answer:
D. a game in which players act in rational, selfminusinterested ways that leave everyone worse off
Explanation:
The prisoners dilemma involves the idea that both people would act in self interests, but this self interests would not help the other one or the group to have a better outcome, so people is acting in detriment of the society or the other participant, it often happens that both people chose to protect themselves damaging the other person, and thus since both had choosen that option both are worse off after it.
Answer: by influencing the production of hormones
A. Ida B. Wells
He urged African Americans to protest by refusing to ride street-cards, to stop buying from white owned stores and only buy from black owned stores
Answer:
well according to dora u need a map to find where to go and the map is your best friend
Explanation:
Thank you for posting your question here. It can be considered to be consistent with the given facts. As you know, an hypothesis, much less a theory, is never proven. It can be shown to be consistent with given observations. As new observations are collected, the given hypothesis may have to be modified.
If the celery became crisp when it was soaked in ice water, then clearly that the water has rehydrated the celery is a reasonable hypothesis. But did it have to be ice cold water? Would room temperature water work? What about boiling water?
And thus most of the time, the success of an hypothesis leads to the design of new experiments to test and expand the original hypothesis.
