Answer:
The final temperature will be close to 20°C
Explanation:
First of all, the resulting temperature of the mix can't be higher than the hot substance's (80°C) or lower than the cold one's (20°C). So options d) and e) are imposible.
Now, due to the high heat capacity of water (4,1813 J/mol*K) it can absorb a huge amount of heat without having a great increment in its temperature. On the other hand, copper have a small heat capacity (0,385 J/mol*K)in comparison.
In conclusion, the copper will release its heat decreasing importantly its temperature and the water will absorb that heat resulting in a small increment of temperature. So the final temperature will be close to 20°C
<u>This analysis can be done because we have equal masses of both substances. </u>
For this question, I think it is the other way around. It is true that chloroacetic acid is stronger in strength than acetic acid. Acid strength is measured as the equilibrium constant of the reaction <span>HA -----> H+ + A-
</span><span> In acetic acid, the anion produced by dissociation is CH3-COO-; in chloroacetic acid it is CH2Cl-COO-. Comparing the two, in the first one the negative charge is taken up mostly by the two oxygen atoms. In the second there is also an electronegative chlorine atom nearby to draw more charge towards itself. Therefore, the charge is less concentrated in the chloroacetate ion than it is in the acetate ion, and, accordingly, chloroacetic acid is stronger than acetic acid. </span>
Answer:
∴ Q = -7.52kCal
Explanation:
Using the formula for specific heat capacity:
Q = mcΔT
where ΔT = change in temperature (final - initial) = (0 - 100)°C = -100°C
m = mass (g) = 75g
c = specific heat capacity = 4.2 J/g°C in water
⇒ Q = 75 × 4.2 × -100
= -31,500J
But 1J - 0.000239kCal
<u>∴ Q = -7.52kCal</u>
<u />
Let me know if I can be of further assistance.
Is the number of protons in an atom, or the total positive charge of an atom.
Answer:
None of the given options
Explanation:
Let's go case by case:
A. No matter the volume, the concentration of Fe(NO₃)₃ (and thus of [Fe³⁺] as well) is 0.050 M.
B. We can calculate the moles of Fe₂(SO₄)₃:
- 0.020 M * 0.80 L = 0.016 mol Fe₂(SO₄)₃
Given that there are two Fe⁺³ moles per Fe₂(SO₄)₃ mol, in the solution we have 0.032 moles of Fe⁺³. With that information in mind we <u>can calculate [Fe⁺³]</u>:
- 0.032 mol Fe⁺³ / 0.80 L = 0.040 M
C. Analog to case A., the molar concentration of Fe⁺³ is 0.040 M.
D. Similar to cases A and C., [Fe⁺³] = 0.010 M.
Thus none of the given options would have [Fe⁺³] = 0.020 M.
